Still think our problem is the whole defensive setup. We dont mark anybody, we mark space. Its not like when we concede these goals, you can watch them back and rant and rave about someone losing their man. They never had a man in the first place. Same about being beaten in the air, they're often not so much beaten, as going for a standing jump, while strikers are moving and have a running jump, so will win an aerial battle 9 times out of 10. All four of the goals we conceded against Villa and West Ham this week, a striker has won a header in the box, and he has simply moved into the space between our 2 centre backs. That is why I think its clearly a problem with the management and whatever the hell we do in training. Because if our defenders are marking men, okay, they still might get beaten in the air, but the striker heading it wont have such an easy job putting it exactly where he wants to.
Every other side in this League watches us and scouts us and knows this is exactly why we set up and we're so easy to score against. Look at Arsenal away, when have you ever seen Arsenal go into a game with the sole tactic of banging balls into the box? Because they were struggling for form at the time, and they knew for a fact that if they kept chucking crosses in, they would score goals. Every other club has put a real emphasis on playing crosses in against us too.
The best example of this total non marking style of defence we have was Man City in the Cup, the second one where the ball went out. I saw a still picture of the moment the ball is out of play, and besides Stones and Sterling, we have about 5 defenders in the box and City have nobody. But they still scored. Because those 5 men were doing nothing but ball watching instead of marking players.