Brendan Janus
Player Valuation: £40m
Barkley passes the ball back to much !!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
FANS IN NOT WANTING TO WATCH RUBBISH SHOCKER!
I'm seriously confused by some of the comments on here. I keep seeing talk of booing and abuse of players but I honestly don't hear that when i'm at the game. Yes theres lots of groaning when things go wrong, and you get fans shouting for them to get it forward quicker or clear their lines, but mid game booing and constant heckling? Genuinely not getting it.
The atmosphere is very flat though, and it's obvious why that is. We don't often win and our style of play doesn't really lead to the traditional atmosphere lifters like tough tackles and periods of sustained pressure. There are occasions when the crowd tries to get involved, but then we start going backwards and people lose interest. I remember being at the Emirates in the cup QF in Roberto's first season. It was 1-1 in the second half and after being under the cosh for a bit we got a couple of attacks going. The ball went out for a throw in in the attacking third and 7,000 blues roared the team forward. The manager came out, told Coleman to slow down and we went back into our own half to build slowly from the back. The fans returned to their seats. We don't use the crowd well enough by giving them what they want. Gareth Barry touched on it in an interview yesterday and he's dead right.
FANS IN NOT WANTING TO WATCH RUBBISH SHOCKER!
I'm seriously confused by some of the comments on here. I keep seeing talk of booing and abuse of players but I honestly don't hear that when i'm at the game. Yes theres lots of groaning when things go wrong, and you get fans shouting for them to get it forward quicker or clear their lines, but mid game booing and constant heckling? Genuinely not getting it.
The atmosphere is very flat though, and it's obvious why that is. We don't often win and our style of play doesn't really lead to the traditional atmosphere lifters like tough tackles and periods of sustained pressure. There are occasions when the crowd tries to get involved, but then we start going backwards and people lose interest. I remember being at the Emirates in the cup QF in Roberto's first season. It was 1-1 in the second half and after being under the cosh for a bit we got a couple of attacks going. The ball went out for a throw in in the attacking third and 7,000 blues roared the team forward. The manager came out, told Coleman to slow down and we went back into our own half to build slowly from the back. The fans returned to their seats. We don't use the crowd well enough by giving them what they want. Gareth Barry touched on it in an interview yesterday and he's dead right.
The crowd have every right to groan at Kone, he's [Poor language removed]!Home crowd at it again with trying to inspire Kone by groaning about him.
Home crowd at it again with trying to inspire Kone by groaning about him.
Correct pal...only Kone can get the side on his side.
I did groan when Osman came on though.
The Osman sub made lots of sense to me, actually. One of the few things Osman is good at now is playing with the ball at his feet in tight areas with lots of defenders around him, which was exactly what we needed with West Brom dropping ten men into the penalty area. It made far more sense than the other two substitutions, and my only problem with it is that it was too late in the match to make much difference. The other two substitutions didn't make much sense to me, though.
Pienaar would have made sense to come on for Cleverley, but not to play centrally.I expected pienaar tbh. Was thinking it he'd be the one martinez would go to.