diggerdestroyer
Player Valuation: £40m
I could think of 10+ individuals that we could sell to help that situation.Probably true but we need more than one player and I would be surprised if Frank doesn't agree. Maybe we need to sell
I could think of 10+ individuals that we could sell to help that situation.Probably true but we need more than one player and I would be surprised if Frank doesn't agree. Maybe we need to sell
A national team isn’t a clubYou literally backed up what I said. And called me numbnuts in the process.
You ok?
It doesnt work like that mate, thats just a myth that Zat has peddled, the actual formula and how it works out is so complex that we would need many letters after our name to truly understand it.I had previously thought that was the case but we don’t know the terms of the sale for Digne.
If we received all the money for Digne up front and then paid for the two young full backs in instalments then there is a slim chance we could still have some leverage/financial trickery in this window especially knowing that we have a lot of big contracts falling off the books in the summer
I don’t see us signing Barkley on a permanent basis. The only way that it becomes acceptable is if it’s a loan deal.I’d imagine Barkley would be available for next to nothing now. Doesn’t really play much and hardly any clubs are interested. With us after VDB on loan the way we get Barkley would be a purchase.
I don’t remember if Lampard really rated him at Chelsea though, was it not him that sanctioned the loan to Villa? Maybe he prefers RLC
I don’t see it happening tbh, I’d be surprised if Lampard wanted him.I don’t see us signing Barkley on a permanent basis. The only way that it becomes acceptable is if it’s a loan deal.
It doesnt work like that mate, thats just a myth that Zat has peddled, the actual formula and how it works out is so complex that we would need many letters after our name to truly understand it.
If you asked me we have not a penny, but there are ways and indeed means and much tricky to make money appear.
Im defo not saying we wont or cant spend, but, who knows.
120k sounds like a lot but if it’s only for 20 weeks, thats 2.5M. Not a bad loan fee.
I don’t see it happening tbh, I’d be surprised if Lampard wanted him.
Well that hair has been officially split.A national team isn’t a club
So 5million all in?But usually you pay a loan fee as well.
I’d imagine Barkley would be available for next to nothing now.
I’d imagine Barkley would be available for next to nothing now. Doesn’t really play much and hardly any clubs are interested. With us after VDB on loan the way we get Barkley would be a purchase.
I don’t remember if Lampard really rated him at Chelsea though, was it not him that sanctioned the loan to Villa? Maybe he prefers RLC