Bullens Rd
Player Valuation: £35m
Continues to baffle me how nobody at Everton has thought, in the past 20 years, that having a number of quick players in the starting xi would be a really good idea.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
- Status
SpongeBob brown shoes
Player Valuation: £40m
That's fare enough if they wanted to go, but they are contracted to us, so we shouldn't be letting them go if we haven't got good enough cover for them
billyblue80
Player Valuation: £70m
We look a slow team right now but is it as much mentality as pace? We looked very lethargic the last few weeks. I agree we need to identify pace as a factor in any player we add you need a mix. Richy is the only one with the blistering pace to get in behind which is ludicrous really you need a few of these in a squad. Currently we cannot stretch the game or get close to Dom.
brettangellnightporter
Player Valuation: £1.5m
ERM, they can't think themselves quick
Bullens Rd
Player Valuation: £35m
But they deffo can think themselves thick.
walcott is not a decent forward tho .. he’s been crap for years.
Dymak
Player Valuation: £40m
I don’t agree mate. He had qualities, which he has shown at Arsenal, Everton and Southampton. But regardless, we thought paying 50k a week to deprive ourself of a player of significant utility made more sense than paying 100k a week to have a player of significant utility.
You can argue about Walcott’s quality all day, but we are paying 50k a week for no benefit or utility at all!
Worse, that 50k a week facilitates Southampton’s utility of Walcott, and he will continue to do well for them.
going off that logic we should have kept sandro around the last few seasons. We need to reduce the wage bill. We can only deal with clubs that want players . Walcott was wanted so he had to go .
Dymak
Player Valuation: £40m
It’s not the same. Sandro isn’t anything approaching Walcott’s quality. We haven’t missed Sandro, but I think we have missed Walcott and will continue to do so, and we’re paying for the ‘privilege’.
It’s incredible really. If we are going to build a team around James, who generally doesn’t run, then having the likes of Sigurdsson in the team at the same time is just suicidal.
Either we push James central and get a decent RW or we need to buy a more mobile attacking CM to play at the top of the midfield 3.
Dymak
Player Valuation: £40m
Can anyone tell me of any other teams that have been built around players that don’t run?
Saint Domingo
Player Valuation: £90m
All of the top teams have pace and power now in every position. Everton continue to continuously buy players without these for some reason. Sigurdsson Keane Coleman Bernard are all too slow for the premier league and unfortunately they’ve been surrounded by players not much quicker such as Mina Allan and James. It all leads to a team that can’t get the ball back even against average opposition.
The recent signings of Docuoure Nkonkou Godfrey gives some hope that we’re going in a different direction but we’ve been doing this since the turn of the millennium, even Moyes’ best teams did not have quick players in them .
Pat Butcher
Player Valuation: £10m
Allan, Doucoure, Gomes, Gylfi, Delph, Davies, Gbamin, Besic, Baningime
How many should we keep?
How many should we keep?
hallamblue
Player Valuation: £40m
Keep Allan and Doucoure, sell the rest and buy an attacking midfielder with pace.
- Status