Everton Summer 2024 Transfer Thread

[Curtis]

So after trippier im assuming Danny ings incoming , burnley all star team baby

 

[blue to the bone]

weird how newcastle replaced their 33 year old ageing and mistake prone full back for a highly rated young 21 year old and a highly rated young 19 year old

its almost as if their director of football knows what they are doing

Also helps to be the richest club in the world even if they are been hindered by ffp

 

[ToffeeScot]

There we go. Unlikely any more transfers.

 

[blue to the bone]

There we go. Unlikely any more transfers.

If we sell players there will players in
I think it's pretty obvious.

 

[ToffeeScot]

If we sell players there will players in
I think it's pretty obvious.

I agree, just saying as it's funny that the predictable line comes out.

 

[RomanReigns]

Also helps to be the richest club in the world even if they are been hindered by ffp

every club is the richest club in the world until they are hindered by ffp

this is the billionaire boys club that we are playing in

 

[Dwight K Schrute]

If we sell players there will players in
I think it's pretty obvious.

I really don't think we'll sell anyone tbh. And if we do, it will be DCL late on for between £10-£15m and all of that will be swallowed up by panic signing a carthorse to replace him.

Keane will stay. Holgate will stay or go on loan with us covering all of his wages. We'll get almost nothing for Maupay - probably that loan with an obligation nonesense that was discussed. We have no-one else to sell - and the issue of signing over the hill rubbish on big wages continues to haunt us.

 

[bluestevon]

Better than what we have comfortably, one year deal so not stuck paying for him restricting future years business.

Short term a good decision.

 

[Neiler]

I guess they hoped they could just about struggle through with what they had but the injuries and suspension already have just made them realise that they probably can't. I don't think there really is a medium term plan I think they are literally just trying to hang on to their premier league place for now and leave the rest of it to a new owner thats why they make the signings they make and play the football they do it makes no sense to me that some can't seem to see it they are ONLY concerned with limping through to the end of the season still in this league and the sooner people accept it the better.

I dotn even mind Tripper in isolation mate - but its giving both Coleman and Young 70k a week each - then bringing in another on big wages - ive no doubt what you describe is happening but i think even in that context its such bad planning- but its utterly stupid to have made a decision on Coleman and Young and then do this anyway. im not saying Tripper is even the wrong choice - more that it was stupid to do Coleman and Yong as well and i wouldn't even be those twos biggest cirticis.

 

[Neiler]

But does it surprise you mate, I posted in here before the Brighton game that keane was above O'brien in the pecking order and got laughter at its got dyche all over it. But I would welcome trippier because he's better than want we have.

Have to say i am bit surprised, i maybe foolishly thought wed moved on from from building overhangs of players in certain positions and wasting squad places and wages......im really annoyed about it.

 

[Stuartisitc1878]

I dotn even mind Tripper in isolation mate - but its giving both Coleman and Young 70k a week each - then bringing in another on big wages - ive no doubt what you describe is happening but i think even in that context its such bad planning- but its utterly stupid to have made a decision on Coleman and Young and then do this anyway. im not saying Tripper is even the wrong choice - more that it was stupid to do Coleman and Yong as well and i wouldn't even be those twos biggest cirticis.

are Young and Coleman on 70k a week? I thought part of the renegotiation over the summer were considerably reduced wages?

 

[mikel_88]

I dotn even mind Tripper in isolation mate - but its giving both Coleman and Young 70k a week each - then bringing in another on big wages - ive no doubt what you describe is happening but i think even in that context its such bad planning- but its utterly stupid to have made a decision on Coleman and Young and then do this anyway. im not saying Tripper is even the wrong choice - more that it was stupid to do Coleman and Yong as well and i wouldn't even be those twos biggest cirticis.

Eap if money is tight 100% and then you put patterson in the mix is 4 right sided players

 

[Neiler]

are Young and Coleman on 70k a week? I thought part of the renegotiation over the summer were considerably reduced wages?

You might be right - i dont know for certain on the renegotiations - but i know Seamus was on about 68K last year and Young 70k. Cant see it being drastically reduced if has neem.

 

[nsno-chris]

We're 1 long term injury away from seeing Ashley Young as our permanent left back for a season, but yeah lets sign another right back

 

[bluestevon]

I dotn even mind Tripper in isolation mate - but its giving both Coleman and Young 70k a week each - then bringing in another on big wages - ive no doubt what you describe is happening but i think even in that context its such bad planning- but its utterly stupid to have made a decision on Coleman and Young and then do this anyway. im not saying Tripper is even the wrong choice - more that it was stupid to do Coleman and Yong as well and i wouldn't even be those twos biggest cirticis.

Coleman and Young are not on 70k per week each mate.

Best reports I can see has them on 55 and 40 respectively as of last season, it's reasonable to assume both resigned on a one year deal on a lesser amount also given their age and lack of other options available yo either besides retiring.