Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Everton Summer 2024 Transfer Thread

RomanReigns said:
we can only make a loss of 105 mil over 3 years

covid is now over, we can't use that excuse

at the moment these are our losses in the last 2 years

2023/2024: ?
2022/2023: -89.1 mil loss
2021/2022: -38.3 mil loss

we are already at a loss of £127.4 mil for the last 2 years which is 22.4 mil over the 105 mil threshold for allowable losses over a 3 year period

i don't think the club has made a profit since 2016/2017

we don't know what the club accounts will show for the 2023/2024 season however its safe to assume it won't be a profit and if anything it's likely to be a significant loss somewhere between 38.3 mil and 89.1 mil

let say the loss is around 50 mil for 23/24, that means we would need to sell players and achieve a player trading profit for somewhere in the region of around 70-80 mil to comply with PSR for the period between 2021/2022 to 2023/2024

what excuse do you believe that club can use to get away with exceeding the 105 mil loss threshold for PSR without player sales? Stadium Costs? Stadium Interest?

people forget stadium costs are not factored into PSR and the dispute over the interest was only around 4 mil or so
Click to expand...
I might be wrong but I don't think the £89.1 loss was used for PSR purposes as that was before allowable deductions. Not sure what the recalculated figure was though.
 
RomanReigns said:
we can only make a loss of 105 mil over 3 years

covid is now over, we can't use that excuse

at the moment these are our losses in the last 2 years

2023/2024: ?
2022/2023: -89.1 mil loss
2021/2022: -38.3 mil loss

we are already at a loss of £127.4 mil for the last 2 years which is 22.4 mil over the 105 mil threshold for allowable losses over a 3 year period

i don't think the club has made a profit since 2016/2017

we don't know what the club accounts will show for the 2023/2024 season however its safe to assume it won't be a profit and if anything it's likely to be a significant loss somewhere between 38.3 mil and 89.1 mil

let say the loss is around 50 mil for 23/24, that means we would need to sell players and achieve a player trading profit for somewhere in the region of around 70-80 mil to comply with PSR for the period between 2021/2022 to 2023/2024

what excuse do you believe that club can use to get away with exceeding the 105 mil loss threshold for PSR without player sales? Stadium Costs? Stadium Interest?

people forget stadium costs are not factored into PSR and the dispute over the interest was only around 4 mil or so
Click to expand...
2/10. Try again for your scaremongering.
 
Tree13 said:
Tugboat Michael gets paid around £4m a year to NOT play football. Why would he go elsewhere for lower wages and the added inconvenience of being asked to display exactly how poop he is at football?
Click to expand...
He might not be good enough but no suggestion he is a bad egg and just wants to sit on the bench collecting a paypacket. Do not forget we've been remarkably lucky that Tarkowski (a warrior) and branthwaite (a rolls royce) have not had any key injuries at all. We need players who can step in. Keane isn't amazing and if we can offload him and replace him with an improvement, great, but otherwise he's an alright back up.
 

andy4efc said:
He might not be good enough but no suggestion he is a bad egg and just wants to sit on the bench collecting a paypacket. Do not forget we've been remarkably lucky that Tarkowski (a warrior) and branthwaite (a rolls royce) have not had any key injuries at all. We need players who can step in. Keane isn't amazing and if we can offload him and replace him with an improvement, great, but otherwise he's an alright back up.
Click to expand...

1) He has been doing exactly that: sitting on the bench, collecting wages.

2) yes we do need squad depth.

3) no we shouldn't be paying starter money to a guy who's never going to start because he's proved time and again he's an utter liability.

Can't believe there's anyone who would suggest Keane is a viable option on the field. I'd prefer Godfrey, Holgate or even Coleman play CB ahead of Keane.
 
RomanReigns said:
we can only make a loss of 105 mil over 3 years

covid is now over, we can't use that excuse

at the moment these are our losses in the last 2 years

2023/2024: ?
2022/2023: -89.1 mil loss
2021/2022: -38.3 mil loss

we are already at a loss of £127.4 mil for the last 2 years which is 22.4 mil over the 105 mil threshold for allowable losses over a 3 year period

i don't think the club has made a profit since 2016/2017

we don't know what the club accounts will show for the 2023/2024 season however its safe to assume it won't be a profit and if anything it's likely to be a significant loss somewhere between 38.3 mil and 89.1 mil

let say the loss is around 50 mil for 23/24, that means we would need to sell players and achieve a player trading profit for somewhere in the region of around 70-80 mil to comply with PSR for the period between 2021/2022 to 2023/2024

what excuse do you believe that club can use to get away with exceeding the 105 mil loss threshold for PSR without player sales? Stadium Costs? Stadium Interest?

people forget stadium costs are not factored into PSR and the dispute over the interest was only around 4 mil or so
Click to expand...
Why does this post you replied to say my name spud.
 
RomanReigns said:
we can only make a loss of 105 mil over 3 years

covid is now over, we can't use that excuse

at the moment these are our losses in the last 2 years

2023/2024: ?
2022/2023: -89.1 mil loss
2021/2022: -38.3 mil loss

we are already at a loss of £127.4 mil for the last 2 years which is 22.4 mil over the 105 mil threshold for allowable losses over a 3 year period

i don't think the club has made a profit since 2016/2017

we don't know what the club accounts will show for the 2023/2024 season however its safe to assume it won't be a profit and if anything it's likely to be a significant loss somewhere between 38.3 mil and 89.1 mil

let say the loss is around 50 mil for 23/24, that means we would need to sell players and achieve a player trading profit for somewhere in the region of around 70-80 mil to comply with PSR for the period between 2021/2022 to 2023/2024

what excuse do you believe that club can use to get away with exceeding the 105 mil loss threshold for PSR without player sales? Stadium Costs? Stadium Interest?

people forget stadium costs are not factored into PSR and the dispute over the interest was only around 4 mil or so
Click to expand...

Those aren’t losses for PSR purposes.

You have a total loss of c£130m for 2022 and 2023 whereas the adjusted PSR losses for those years are about half of this.
 

RomanReigns said:
1/10 insightful

Least I will have a post to vault next season
Click to expand...
Your sums are wrong though and you know it. You have sensationalised it all to make up rubbish. There are literal documents that prove you are wrong. We got points deductions for circa £20 loss over 3 seasons over £105mill and then around £15milll over £105 ove the 3 years.

So yeah you are utterly wrong.
 
ashwuk76 said:
Your sums are wrong though and you know it. You have sensationalised it all to make up rubbish. There are literal documents that prove you are wrong. We got points deductions for circa £20 loss over 3 seasons over £105mill and then around £15milll over £105 ove the 3 years.

So yeah you are utterly wrong.
Click to expand...
I have taken literal facts and numbers from our accounts

If you read the post I also said that we can’t use covid as an excuse anymore and that is a major reason why our enormous losses were significantly reduced

You think we will get permissible Covid allowances from 2021/2022 onwards?
 

Welcome to GrandOldTeam

Get involved. Registration is simple and free.

Register
Back
Top