Well I didn't say it wouldn't be disruptive. What I'm saying is that I don't think that would the reason for not doing it. If they could get rid of all the players Zat mentioned I have no doubt they would, disruption wouldn't even enter their thinking, but realistically they wouldn't be able to.How is losing 9 players from a first team squad not disruptive, even if they're not regular starters lol And I get that some kind of refresh is required, but I do think that it is a bit much.
Agree though that the logistics is as much of a barrier.
Be really interested in those who wish to flee for more football. Think that has been where many of our previous managers have failed - being able to convince certain players that it is in their best interests to look elsewhere. Not sure why this is the case, probably a combination of the money, but also those managers not having a clear enough picture as to who is needed and who is actually surplus (so keep em all). Too much drudgery to be ruthless
Disruption like that is massively overstated though, people always talk about new players gelling etc but there are tons of examples of clubs signing multiple new players and it working just fine. You just have to sign the right players. There's a decent chance that of the list Zat posted 3/4/5 of them won't start a game for us in the second half of the season. The disruption caused by players like that leaving is minimal. It won't happen because it would leave us too much to do in one summer, but I wouldn't be even remotely concerned about disrupting a squad which has looked completely disharmonious, bloated and unbalanced for years.