Very fair points. For me, it boils down to how easily we can rectify a bad deal. If we bought a young player on middling wages, we’d probably recoup most of what we spent a year or two down the line (or at least most of their value at the time of sale).We've recruited badly, but that's clouded a lot of people's judgement as to what constitutes good recruitment. The default position for a lot of people has just become 'do the exact opposite of what we have been doing' but it isn't that simple. Lots of young championship players have come up and not made the grade too, and lots have done OK for where they've gone but would undoubtedly be classed as failures here. Likewise lots of players similar in profile to what we've been buying have succeeded elsewhere. We need to recruit better but that runs a lot deeper than just changing where we buy from.
Like I said, I totally agree that we need to refresh the side and bring in younger players, but we have got to be careful of the balance too. Not just in terms of age but in terms of people who you know can be trusted to produce.
Where we’ve been hurt time and time again is moving on players that had that experience and the wages that come with it.
I get that the idea is to bring in players we don’t need to sell after a year but we have to be realistic with our recent record. I’ve said it before but this really is last chance saloon for us; once Richy and DCL go there is no other means of us injecting cash into the squad; if we bloat it again with crap we can’t get rid of then we’re 100% doomed.