Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Grammatically “would look” is a future conditional = something that has not begun but might come to pass in the future under certain conditions.
So the article indicates a future possibility rather than reporting a present reality; in short, the reporter is speculating re Winks. Off how much source information? That we cannot know.
Cheick DoucoureLike......
Yeah I acknowledge that my brain did not produce good words there.??????????????????? Perplexing stuff that post is somehow less coherent than something the actor gary busey would say. Congrats
Is he much better than Tom Davies?. I agree technically on the ball he is but is it what we need. With tight funds we have, think we need to address major key areas. First one being a holding midfielder, a centre back and potentially replacement for Richie.I think Winks would be a great signing. Our crowd will make him a better player.
Would love to team him up with Ward-Prowse. I'd trust Lampard to know a decent midfielder so if he fancies Winks that's good enough for me.
I don't think Tom is good enough for us. Shame as he seems a top lad - but footy is ruthless - so I think we need to move him on.Is he much better than Tom Davies?. I agree technically on the ball he is but is it what we need. With tight funds we have, think we need to address major key areas. First one being a holding midfielder, a centre back and potentially replacement for Richie.
Add Southampton to that list.Oh sorry I worded that bad. The bottom three will come from those six.
Yeah that was poor English.
Welcome Winky.
Expected to complete Tarkowski signing, who was apparently leaning towards us over Villa.
Winks (loan with option) & Gallagher on a list of players we want, Lampard wants at least 4 in this window. Gilmour liked too
Frank Lampard targets Tottenham's Harry Winks in Everton rebuild
Meanwhile, a deal for defender James Tarkowski on a free transfer is close to completionwww.telegraph.co.uk
….this one doesn’t last very long.
A loan with an option eh.
Well at least we are learning slowly.
Unless we cave to Levy Ball.
If it does happen wont happen until later in the window, Daniel will want to flush out maximum desperation.
Do we have £15m+ to spend on him? Can he adapt to the PL?Cheick Doucoure
You're right. Let's instead just sign Winks and suck. Why risk itDo we have £15m+ to spend on him? Can he adapt to the PL?
Will he pick us over other clubs? such as clubs with European football who are linked, or even Palace who are heavily interested where he would be managed by a French speaking former world class defensive midfielder (which I'm sure would be an attractive proposition for him).
You have suggested he is a player who 'might not suck'. Big gamble on someone when the people championing him aren't even convinced. Especially when we are skint and are playing in the freebie/loan categories.
I mean I don't want winks, but signing kids from the French league is a gamble. We don't have the money to take gambles right now. Because if they fail, we are in an even worse position.You're right. Let's instead just sign Winks and suck. Why risk it
Needs his own thread.I think Winks would be a great signing. Our crowd will make him a better player.
Would love to team him up with Ward-Prowse. I'd trust Lampard to know a decent midfielder so if he fancies Winks that's good enough for me.
I'd argue it's the opposite. I think we have to take on some risk or we can't move forward.I mean I don't want winks, but signing kids from the French league is a gamble. We don't have the money to take gambles right now. Because if they fail, we are in an even worse position.