Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There's a reason Newcastle & West Ham have baulked at signing him.
But you think we are better finance wise to do it .
Never cease to amaze.
Not gonna lie the thought of J-Lingz doing mad tingz with the ball at his feet wearing the Royal Blue Jersey gets me somewhat aroused.
Lingard is crap !
Should have sold all those wasters and kept Hamez on his 90k pw ( like all the club briefed press told us when he signed , as did the Madrid press ) but you know this.The difference was we were paying James 200k a week to be fit for 50% of the season.
If Lingz takes a 80k-100k a week contract and is fit for 90%+ of the season then happy days.
To put that into perspective Gomes is on 100k a week and is useless, Gbamin is on around 60k a week and is useless and we've just lost Siggurdsson and Delph with combined wages of around £180k a week
Had a message this morning saying we're talking to Gallagher & it's progressing well, perm with option to buy back. Usually reliable the guy whose told me
Need to sack that off. Screwed us over with Geri if I remember rightly.
Apparently their could be movement as early as next week, a former player is the original source from the guy who passes it on to me. Think Chelsea include them in the vast majority of deals, don't know if they've ever used them or not
Here's the big flaw in your calculations Zat mate, it's one a lot of people do.
We sell Richarlison for 50m then you calculate that as that instantly hits the books it allows us to spend at least that and in fact a lot more as fees in will be spread over the contract so say 3 year contracts we can spend 90m and only 30m hits the books this season and then next 30m etc, correct?
But what you are then forgetting is using that form of calculation every player we have bought over the past three seasons this coming season will have a third of the cost of the deal having to be factors in
So just take last season we sold Digne - none of that goes onto this coming seasons books, but we bought Gray, Mykolenko And Patterson.
A % of their fees now comes off what we can spend this sesson, correct?
Roll that back to the season before and everyone bought under Carlo, we also have to pay a % of there fees which comes of this season, again, correct?
See now the huge flaw in your calculations?
Seen upto 200k but 150k still Crikey .Wants £150k a week doesn’t he? Would be our second highest paid player of all time.
Nobody is, you monumental rectum.He's not great but he's better than some of the rubbish we have mate.
If you can punt Gomes for a few quid and replace his wage with Lingz on a free contract whilst funds are spent elswhere on Richys replacement and the midfield I'll be happy enough with that.
People expecting a summer splurge are in for dissapointment - until next summer lands we still have to wheel and deal.
He's not great but he's better than some of the rubbish we have mate.
If you can punt Gomes for a few quid and replace his wage with Lingz on a free contract whilst funds are spent elswhere on Richys replacement and the midfield I'll be happy enough with that.
People expecting a summer splurge are in for dissapointment - until next summer lands we still have to wheel and deal.
My issue with buybacks, ot relies on our negotiators doing a good job. In terms of the figures, and the dates it has to be done by etc etc. And I don't have any faith it the people at the top of our club to do it in a way that benefits or protects us.This would be a masterstroke.
I dont mind buybacks...depends on the numbers and if theres a timeframe.
E.g £35mil deal but buyback of £50mil if executed within 2 seasons would be decent.
Well, no because its already factored into the 'current' P&S / FFP calculations which we have already passed.
So if weve passed then exact same numbers would be carried over to 'this' coming season less the wages removed from Richarlison + out of contract players...but obviously there will be new contracts and other items were unaware of.
I'd agree with you on this point, its a good one-- but the regulations split the cost over the contracts evenly no matter the actual deal so...
A huge pyramid scheme
I dunno, Zat thinks we are gonna be spending 100m a season on U23 players in some sort of weird ponzi scheme.I’ll fill the void left By
Nobody is, you monumental rectum.
Not as much as Rafael in his budgie smugglers though I'd wagerNot gonna lie the thought of J-Lingz doing mad tingz with the ball at his feet wearing the Royal Blue Jersey gets me somewhat aroused.
Because the team is already entirely too old
lollollollolI dunno, Zat thinks we are gonna be spending 100m a season on U23 players in some sort of weird ponzi scheme.