FFP is for teams in Europe mateEasy; three letters.
FFP.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
FFP is for teams in Europe mateEasy; three letters.
FFP.
Easy; three letters.Honestly, how in the actual fourletterswearword are we still without a new RB?
Oh...FFP is for teams in Europe mate
So how does Man City and United spend hundreds if millions and we can't spend five?FFP only applies to clubs playing in European competition
Which isn't us
It's the Premier League sustainability rules that are hindering us
Hypothetically thats what we should be doing. In reality the money would be given to Moshiris pick of manager each year to waste on rubbish.
So if we effectively liquidised the first team squad we'd maybe break even. That isn't a good sign.
Because Man City won the league and got into the Champions League final and Man Utd have sponsorship deals that we can only dream ofSo how does Man City and United spend hundreds if millions and we can't spend five?
Kean goes and I reckon we will get some movement… I can see McNeil being a possibility although not what weI think @Neiler knocked up something about our FFP/Profit and sustainability level this summer.
Would be interesting to see what it could look like next summer.
My guess is that there are still some twists and turns this window and hope we can bring in Aarons (linked before) and McNeil.
Those two may not excite people and come for chunky fees but i think we will sell and invest. Probably just 3 players away then.
Potentially but then its Brands and Moshiri running the show so you are more likely to replace quality with crap.Hypothetically its not "pointless".
Leicester, Atletico and plenty of other teams have sold their top players to push themselves further up the table.
As much as we like the players, what if their replacement is better?
Weve got 5 centre backs in; Mina, Godfrey, Keane, Holgate and Branthwaite.
What if we sold 2 of them and signed a young star player for the combined fee?
What if we sold Richarlison (who i really like) and brought in 2 or 3 top young players for the same fee?
City win things, merch sales etc, United regularly qualify for Europe and again get revenue from merch, sponsor deals and so onSo how does Man City and United spend hundreds if millions and we can't spend five?
That’s the concern. Trusting our lot with nigh on £100 million is a big gamble.Potentially but then its Brands and Moshiri running the show so you are more likely to replace quality with crap.
Stop this, we can’t do £15m for Dumfries much less £30+ for himI think @Neiler knocked up something about our FFP/Profit and sustainability level this summer.
Would be interesting to see what it could look like next summer.
My guess is that there are still some twists and turns this window and hope we can bring in Aarons (linked before) and McNeil.
Those two may not excite people and come for chunky fees but i think we will sell and invest. Probably just 3 players away then.
I'd love to know who you think we could sell to raise far, far more than £275m from our current squad.I wrote we would "eclipse" the £275mil.
In other words it would be far, far higher.
They sell players and have an income.So how does Man City and United spend hundreds if millions and we can't spend five?
Man City get about £60m a year more in revenue a year through Champions League!So how does Man City and United spend hundreds if millions and we can't spend five?