Turn the question on its head.
In a high line would you prefer both centre backs to be quick, or just one?
If we played a bit higher then we could use Godfrey as the covering defender due to his pace. Wouldnt you prefer to see Godfrey going out to snap forwards with another quick ball playing defender on the cover?
Of course we need a centre back, unless you would prefer us to continue sitting deep every game.
We have a full house of centre backs but only one who can become top class.
if you sell Holgate then you cant play the 3 at the back with him and Godfrey as the wide centre backs. You cant play Keane and Mina in a 3, its suicidal.
We go with Godfrey/Holgate + one of Keane/Mina as rotation for the new signing.
Incorrect. I said we could afford to do that.
Thats due to Moshiri and USMs appetite.
Both of those clubs have financial issues due to the way dortmund is run and Inter's Chinese owners pulling the plug.
Exactly. If you sell then its Keane (peak value) or Mina (2 years left)...or both and bring in a younger top notch centre back with world class potential.
Think Ruben Dias effect for City...alongside Godfrey.
If we go 3 at the back then we can do this.
If we go for an expansive 4 then we would need to splash on multiple wide players in addition to CB, CM and RB
Holgate at worst can play CB in a 4 + RCB in a 3. In addition he can play both full back positions as long as were deep and hes focused on defence.
Keane/Mina can only play CB. Both in a 4 or a 3 they play CB. Thats all.
Godfrey of course, similar to Holgate. Ancelotti said he likes these types and both of them arent at their peak value and have many years in them.
We never play a high line with Keane being a liability.
So many people think hes pracitcally world class while hes just an effective lump to have in a deep defence.
Find a buyer for him and lets go and sign actual top players.