Problem being thats around the amount they've always been looking for, would expect them to look for more next season with the TV money bankedI think 225m is a fair assessment in todays financial climate
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Problem being thats around the amount they've always been looking for, would expect them to look for more next season with the TV money bankedI think 225m is a fair assessment in todays financial climate
It's a strange one this. Partly I would agree for a number of reasons, but for other justifiable factors it personally seems overly excessive.I think 225m is a fair assessment in todays financial climate
Thank you for backing up the contents of my previous posts.Not necessarily all paid off yesterday, just discharge notices submitted. They could have been paid off for months and yesterday might just be admin housekeeping but if nothing else it tidies things up incase of imminent due diligence.
Thank you for backing up the contents of my previous posts.
I also gave a brief synopsis of what the remaining charges were.
2 relate to the bond regarding ticket sales
1 is J G. Funding
1 Barclays right of offset of balances of accounts held with them, effectively an all monies debenture
1 Barclays floating charge over assets.
It is almost certain that no loans were paid off yesterday.
Cheers
According to Deloitte, we are apparently' the 20th richest club in the world. Add to that some of the talent in our squad and the new TV deal
That is a possibility, and I did mention that in my post at just before 11 o'clock last night.As @Thuck ma Baws wrote though, it's still tidying up the books ahead of potential due dilligence.
I kid you not my friend. The 2015 report is based on the 2013/14 season and focuses purely on match day, broadcasting and commercial revenue.You've got to be pulling my leg...
20th richest club in the league more like
Bill and fellow investors tenure has been all about proving that wrong.....buy very cheap.......commit no further finance......sell very dear to whoever matches the astronomical valuationCould it be the case that despite all the hype that goes with football, owning a club rarely brings a profit for anyone
To be fair we are in the richest league in the world which is in the richest continent in the footballing world. Number 7 or 8 in England would have you in top 20 no problemYou've got to be pulling my leg...
20th richest club in the league more like
some weeks you can't tell the difference. You can't, can you?
It's a strange one this. Partly I would agree for a number of reasons, but for other justifiable factors it personally seems overly excessive.
According to Deloitte, we are apparently' the 20th richest club in the world. Add to that some of the talent in our squad and the new TV deal.
We're a very stable platform in terms of the reliability of our league positions, including ventures into Europe. Surely that adds value to the club?
On the other hand though, we need a new stadium, generate little non-TV revenue and have sold many our tangible assets such as Finch Farm.
So to be fair there is evidence to argue each point of view; the real value of the club is only how much someone is wiling to spend.
There is also the argument that many of the board are not actual Evertonians. They invested in the club for their own personal, financial reasons.
Apart from Kenwright, it would be fair to say that the likes of Earl and Green are in it for a profit. That may be hard to swallow, but that's life.
Many people argue that they should sell up on the cheap so that it benefits the club. But what does the club owe them? It's purely business.
Personally, I think it is excessive (as will many others) especially when you consider that any buyer would then need to help finance a stadium.
That's a huge potential outlay when you compare the actual financial benefits that a stadium will bring to the new owners in the long run.
So basically... £225m seems excessive when you consider future requirements. However, maybe that's just the new going rate.