Wes Hoolahan a better option than Juan Mata? Bloody hell.
Off for a walk.
Off for a walk.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are you Wes Hoolahan?
Hoolahan is a better option than Mata for a number of reasons.
- Mata would be expensive and on big wages
- Mata also fades after 70 mins
- Mata would think he's bigger than the club after where he's come from
- Mata usually can;t handle the more physical aspects of the game
- Hoolahan would be cheap for signing and wages, granted he's getting on a bit
- Hoolahan doesn't go missing during games
- Hoolahan wouldn't complain if he was benched/taken off during games
- Hoolahan has a great assist and scoring record for his price range.
Worth a gamble I think and if it didn't work out it wouldn't be a big financial loss.
Wes Hoolahan a better option than Juan Mata? Bloody hell.
Off for a walk.
Hoolahan is a better option than Mata for a number of reasons.
- Mata would be expensive and on big wages
- Mata also fades after 70 mins
- Mata would think he's bigger than the club after where he's come from
- Mata usually can;t handle the more physical aspects of the game
- Hoolahan would be cheap for signing and wages, granted he's getting on a bit
- Hoolahan doesn't go missing during games
- Hoolahan wouldn't complain if he was benched/taken off during games
- Hoolahan has a great assist and scoring record for his price range.
Worth a gamble I think and if it didn't work out it wouldn't be a big financial loss.
Not in any parallel universe would that ever be true.
Cant honestly believe people are turning their noses up at Mata. One of the best play makers around when in the right position.
Hoolahan isn't on the same planet.
Better than Mata? I give up, most ridiculous thing I ever heardHoolahan is a better option than Mata for a number of reasons.
- Mata would be expensive and on big wages
- Mata also fades after 70 mins
- Mata would think he's bigger than the club after where he's come from
- Mata usually can;t handle the more physical aspects of the game
- Hoolahan would be cheap for signing and wages, granted he's getting on a bit
- Hoolahan doesn't go missing during games
- Hoolahan wouldn't complain if he was benched/taken off during games
- Hoolahan has a great assist and scoring record for his price range.
Worth a gamble I think and if it didn't work out it wouldn't be a big financial loss.
Obviously Mata is preferable. But lets be realistic, he's a gamble and at the price he's not worth it. Alternatives to Hoolahan are obviously better, but I didn't bring up Hoolahan in the first place
Hoolahan is quality as a squad player.
Better than Mata? I give up, most ridiculous thing I ever heard
At the price he is worth it mate. He is proven in the league and we are crying out for creativity - something Juan Mata has in droves.
And as for Mata thinking he's bigger than the club, he seems a grounded down-to-earth bloke so I can't see him being arrogant. Oh and he doesn't fade after 70 mins. And he quite blatantly can stand the physical aspects of the game - not missed a single game through injury shows he's quite capable of looking after himself.
Basically your post was tosh.
Hoolahan is a better option than Mata for a number of reasons.
- Mata would be expensive and on big wages
- Mata also fades after 70 mins
- Mata would think he's bigger than the club after where he's come from
- Mata usually can;t handle the more physical aspects of the game
- Hoolahan would be cheap for signing and wages, granted he's getting on a bit
- Hoolahan doesn't go missing during games
- Hoolahan wouldn't complain if he was benched/taken off during games
- Hoolahan has a great assist and scoring record for his price range.
Worth a gamble I think and if it didn't work out it wouldn't be a big financial loss.
Actually cannot believe this has tripped people up on this forum. Come on guys
Finners havin a mare here