It's probably in the fridge lad stuffing it's face.
Unlikely Friend, the fridge is empty.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's probably in the fridge lad stuffing it's face.
He always has a loaf of bread.why do birds suddenly appear every time you are near?
Is that too plain wrong for you to tackle?
I think we underestimate how much dead wood we can clear off the books. Every year a team is allowed a 7 mill increase in wages(NOT counting any increase in commercial revenue, if we say, sign a 20 mill per year sponsorship deal, the skys the limit), we off loaded 67k in salary in Howard/Hibbert/Osman/Pienaar. We can add 134k to that. In addition, moving Niasse, McCarthy, and McGeady clears up another 146k. Thats a total of 322k per week available for players before running over. If we added Witsel at 100k per week, Carvalho at 90k per week, and Williams at 50k per week, Stek was probably 10k per week, and Gueye maybe 25k per, that still leaves us with 50k per week.
Unlikely Friend, the fridge is empty.
Well if that's your conception of the rule I bid you adieu. However you may want to take notice of the bit that regulates the increases of wage bill expenditure.fixed.
The requirements of FFP are: break-even overall & no overdue payments pending.
Freezer?
Well if that's your conception of the rule I bid you adieu. However you may want to take notice of the bit that regulates the increases of wage bill expenditure.
I have to agree with goat that those salaries seem very much on the low side. There's also absolutely no way Stekelenberg signed for 10k a week. In terms of offloading we just need people to be interested in players like McGeady first.I think we underestimate how much dead wood we can clear off the books. Every year a team is allowed a 7 mill increase in wages(NOT counting any increase in commercial revenue, if we say, sign a 20 mill per year sponsorship deal, the skys the limit), we off loaded 67k in salary in Howard/Hibbert/Osman/Pienaar. We can add 134k to that. In addition, moving Niasse, McCarthy, and McGeady clears up another 146k. Thats a total of 322k per week available for players before running over. If we added Witsel at 100k per week, Carvalho at 90k per week, and Williams at 50k per week, Stek was probably 10k per week, and Gueye maybe 25k per, that still leaves us with 50k per week.
You wanna actually think about Koeman's salary? How about the whole new position Walsh occupies? Or the new contract Rom is supposedly signing? Think about those things and the salaries required to attract top talent without cl and then get back to me.seen as we're about 200k-a-week lighter on that front I guess this is adieu x
You wanna actually think about Koeman's salary? How about the whole new position Walsh occupies? Or the new contract Rom is supposedly signing? Think about those things and the salaries required to attract top talent without cl and then get back to me.
I thought about them and come to the conclusion that the reason we've not added to Gueye isn't because of FFP. We'd need to sign 2 or 3 high-earners before that kicks in.
Are you aware that revenues-in other than sales count towards this 'breaking-even' concept? We managed it fine last summer with those 4 retired players still on the books. Koeman & Walsh haven't suddenly turned all that upside down.
Yes I am aware. Are you aware that our commercial performance is pitiful? We managed it fine because we didn't come close to adding 8m to our wage budget. They haven't but they've eaten up a lot of the wages dropped from released players.I thought about them and come to the conclusion that the reason we've not added to Gueye isn't because of FFP. We'd need to sign 2 or 3 high-earners before that kicks in.
Are you aware that revenues-in other than sales count towards this 'breaking-even' concept? We managed it fine last summer with those 4 retired players still on the books. Koeman & Walsh haven't suddenly turned all that upside down.