I do think it’s a short term issue though.That sounds even worse .
Thanks for putting it in plain and cold terms for me . It sounds a tad scary but totally logical .
In two years say, we would look much healthier due to the fact that the wage bill should be reduced.
Thinking about the list of players that would be gone who don’t have any real impact on the team. We just need to get the wage bill down, turnover up. Then we’d be back to be self sustaining.
We are taking a calculated risk at the moment. A short term one. Moving 6 places up the table for instance is worth 12m. We’ve created the need to sell players now having already reduced the wage bill ahead of the 3 we’ve signed. So as we get rid of players now or as they gradually see out of their contracts, it makes the wage bill healthier without it being detrimental to the team.
think Sandro, tosun, besic, Walcott, bolasie and Delph.
from this point, any of those players going would have a very small impact on the first team. But you are talking probably £21m in wages a year from those players. And our wage bill is about 90m.
The majority of nearly 25% of our wage bill gone in 12 months time.
It’s precarious at the moment but we’ll sort it out.