There’s no doubt last year’s 2nd year u18 and this year’s 2 years have been way below the standard of previous years. There have been a few individuals, Feeney, Evans, Beni last year, Hornby , Denny this but the overall standard of the players around them has been poor to average. Of the starting 11 for the Youth Cup match 6 were first year u18s . While this hopefully points to a bunch of talented , fast developing 1st years, it also backs up the statement that many of the 2nd years haven’t been good enough. Hornby of course and Con Ouzonidis , presumably injured,were the only two missing.Before the start of this season I remember people saying we had a bit of a talent gap in the ages coming directly through after our really good U23 so overall I've been pleasantly surprised by the general U23 and U18 team performances this year. Possibly playing above themselves so far which means a struggle might be expected at some point in the season.
In both recent games, u18 and U23s , we seemed to have the same traits. Young defenders, who make mistakes but really do look “ good for their age”. Solid but unspectacular DFM pairings in Denny/ Scully and Beni/Adeniran who do the job but don’t provide attacking threat. A good striker leading the line , Mampala at U18, Hornby U23s, but lacking any regular, decent supply to them . In both games there was a dearth of exciting midfield play, only Gordon over the two games provided any real attacking flair, and an ability to open up a defence. For the u18s I thought it was the rigid 4-2-3-1 we used , but even the different u 23 formation didn’t provide any real attacking threat. But both teams are top four in their leagues so I guess they’re not doing too bad.