The big difference is that the first team had five “new” players starting on Saturday who have all done really well. The U23s is virtually the same players who were around last season, the two decent players who moved up from u18 , Denny and Hornby , have been injured , Gordon has rarely started and we’ve never seemed to have a settled side or the same U23s team two games in a row. By contrast in the u18s the same three attackers and four midfielders have between them occupied all the front 6 spots in virtually all games. Consistentency helps and It rarely seems to work when we bring back the likes of Dowell , they don’t seem to integrate quick enough.
There’s an argument that Unsworth is doing a decent job, getting the best out of some pretty average players and keeping them at the top of the league. The problem for me is that his strengths have always been in organising the defence and defensive mid field. You could send Browning, Feeney out on loan and he’d still put a decent defense together. But we’ve never been an attractive attacking side which scores lots of goals in all his years. While we haven’t had any prolific goalscorers at U23s for years, with the individual talent we’ve seen at times from the likes of Bowler, Gordon and Evans we should be fashioning them into a more attractive attacking team.
As ever at this level it will be a season of two halves, with people moving out on loan come January and hopefully soon some of the promising u18s getting a chance.,