deipnosophist
Player Valuation: £80m
You minxI'm hoping on 3 more after Bolasie. Net spend of around 60-70m.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You minxI'm hoping on 3 more after Bolasie. Net spend of around 60-70m.
Shouldn't really try to post things as fact when they're clearly not.Lets hope it stays there.
Big tart.You minx
I didn't but that is what it looks like to me.Shouldn't really try to post things as fact when they're clearly not.
Then it's opinion. And no one allowed an opinion on here unless they have prior agreed permission from the bad clique.I didn't but that is what it looks like to me.
Not sure about logic here to be honest, Stones was always going to go so buying marquee players early makes sense. In saying that the simple fact is we haven't spent money until we've sold Stones, that's what is worrying....and City were correct to adopt that strategy. I dont see the price fetched for Stones as great, tbh. Everton blinked first and City got Stones for about £8M cheaper than if Everton were in command of their own transfer window destiny.
Whatever the reasons on the hold ups, securing such players takes boldness to cut through all that. As i understand it our strategy is to use a big value sale to clear the decks for big wage purchases (whatever the fee that they're secured for). So how could we have been bold enough to secure those targets early in the window if the pre-requisite was a big name going out the door. The cart was put before the horse.
I think it was more before we hired Walsh but leaving it late also lessens the chance of getting into a bidding war. We did also need to know what our budget was so Stones was definitely a factor. Thats now clear.Not sure about logic here to be honest, Stones was always going to go so buying marquee players early makes sense. In saying that the simple fact is we haven't spent money until we've sold Stones, that's what is worrying.
(Insert some quote from about "the game".)Then it's opinion. And no one allowed an opinion on here unless they have prior agreed permission from the bad clique.
Again mate, don't try to use your imaginings as facts. You may well be right, but let's wait and see. @chicoazul, opinions?I think it was more before we hired Walsh but leaving it late also lessens the chance of getting into a bidding war. We did also need to know what our budget was so Stones was definitely a factor. Thats now clear.
I don't do opinions man. Only hysteria.Again mate, don't try to use your imaginings as facts. You may well be right, but let's wait and see. @chicoazul, opinions?
Don't you ever sleep mate?I don't do opinions man. Only hysteria.
I have actual insomnia mate. I hate it.Don't you ever sleep mate?
How is it clear exactly .I think it was more before we hired Walsh but leaving it late also lessens the chance of getting into a bidding war. We did also need to know what our budget was so Stones was definitely a factor. Thats now clear.
I have actual insomnia mate. I hate it.