toffee matt
Player Valuation: £60m
Kenwright wouldn't have brought Koeman in because it's highly unlikely he'd have sacked El Broguez.
I don't think is kenwright would have had a choice tbh. The players were in open revolt
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Kenwright wouldn't have brought Koeman in because it's highly unlikely he'd have sacked El Broguez.
Kenwright wouldn't have brought Koeman in because it's highly unlikely he'd have sacked El Broguez.
Given the level of appointments BK made previously coupled with his limited finances the likely level would have been Eddie Howe.Why do you think Kenwright wouldn't of got Koeman?
That's fair, writing him off isn't. I'm personally gonna give him until this time next year.Robert Earl invested a few quid in buying shares and when Destination Kirkby project failed we never heard from him again.
History has made a few people suspicious and rightly so. If we go back to a few months ago we all got carried away thinking we were going to spend a fortune this summer. But, it never happened.
The amount of stadium disasters we have had makes me wary that we will end up on the docks. I'd rather wait until a spade is in the ground before getting excited.
One thing for sure is, Moshiri won't get given time like Bill was. That's for sure.
That's fair, writing him off isn't. I'm personally gonna give him until this time next year.
Not that he will be arsed like.
I agree, one thing is 100% we all wanted a big name signing.Too early to write him off, but the recent window hasn't won him favour in some eyes.
I think the timing would have been different, ie Sometime up to Christmas.I don't think is kenwright would have had a choice tbh. The players were in open revolt
49% made me suspicious,why 49%?
thanks,makes me even more suspicious!Staying below 50%, or 51%, meant that the club didnt have to rearrange loans and stuff, and PL rules, and stuff like that iirc.
Staying below 50%, or 51%, meant that the club didnt have to rearrange loans and stuff, and PL rules, and stuff like that iirc.
I think it has more to do with going over 50% would trigger certain company takeover rules that is to say comercial not FA.
Something like that wasnt it. Either way, it wasnt odd like some are suggesting. Well, hope not!
Esk would know obviously.
Agreed, I still think he can be a game changer, im pretty sure hes as "angry" as some of us are, he promised us the world and gave us nothing, I hope hes angry, I hope he reads this forum with people calling him a fraud and I hope he rams the words down peoples throats.
But to suggest that hes so far "proven his worth" is beyond delusion for me.