Thomasc
Formerly known as By God I'm Blue
royalblue66
Player Valuation: £70m
Think" we should all cancel our ST, because it all seems pointless, Elstone a joke Mosh a fraud, Koeman not up to it, Walsh a waste of space, oh and Kenwright, nothing down for him, new stadium is an illusion , and the woman behind the bar at the PE is a miserable bitch.
Titus Bramble
Best centre half to grace the Premier League
The absolute state of this
Soap
Player Valuation: £6m
Have to agree with you here Dave.
Soap
Player Valuation: £6m
Bad comparison - we haven't won anything for over 20 years full stop.
Something at the club stinks, from top to bottom.
lol lol lol your are ridiclous. If they are those things what the hell was/is kenwright and Martinez then?
No wonder I have you on egnore you never have nothing good to say about Everton and never will go and follow something else
It seems to have gone under the radar, but Everton cleared the second part of the RMF charge yesterday. My belief is this is the part of the charge relating to 17/18 basic payment.
So other than Barclays, the JG Funding charge is the only one on the books, and unless a deed of variation has been done (which I doubt), this can only relate to the rump payment of TV rights for 16/17.
My feeling is that given the borrowings figure shown on the back-drop at the GM of 20+ mil, there is money due to RMF (formerly JG).
The reasons I'm interested in this are that it would appear that this funding model is being done away with (this would have to happen in 18/19 anyway), but where is the alternative funding coming from?
To me the possibilities are sales proceeds with reduced transfer spend (bear in mind that you have to pay off the debt and keep the amount required for funding, so double- whammy), an authorised regulated lender is put in place(Barclays) or Farhad Moshiri puts more money in.
Don't know which (if any) of the 3 it will be though.
So other than Barclays, the JG Funding charge is the only one on the books, and unless a deed of variation has been done (which I doubt), this can only relate to the rump payment of TV rights for 16/17.
My feeling is that given the borrowings figure shown on the back-drop at the GM of 20+ mil, there is money due to RMF (formerly JG).
The reasons I'm interested in this are that it would appear that this funding model is being done away with (this would have to happen in 18/19 anyway), but where is the alternative funding coming from?
To me the possibilities are sales proceeds with reduced transfer spend (bear in mind that you have to pay off the debt and keep the amount required for funding, so double- whammy), an authorised regulated lender is put in place(Barclays) or Farhad Moshiri puts more money in.
Don't know which (if any) of the 3 it will be though.
Kenshin
Player Valuation: £40m
In the general sense right now, i think you have a point about the owner, but then this summer is the marker as to whether that is true or not.
For all we know Walsh could bring in 3-4 players he has spent 12 months scouting and they turn out to be really good for the team. similarly the club could back up the manager and sign him some actually quality players with the huge windfall coming in. Admittedly the net spend might not be negative if we get some of the fees being mentioned, but that is still 100 million or so invested into the first team, you would hope we do some good with it.
Azza
Player Valuation: £80m
Usually they come in around Auguest / September don't they? But yes it will be very interesting to see if Moshiri continues with these loans, which if I remember correctly were mainly to cover cash flow inbetween TV payments?
I am still giving Moshiri the benefit if the doubt but I have to agree that Koeman appears little more than an average manager to me.
And this time next year I can see the same sort of contract renewal wrangle going on with him as we are having with Barkley right now.
Either he will have done well next season and be stalling on signing a proffered new contract....or not having done well and trying to push the club into giving him an extension.
Mosh Pit
Player Valuation: £8m
With Lukaku leaving & probably Barkley... Yes, it will. Net spend means nothing
hallamblue
Player Valuation: £40m
Bob Elstone
Player Valuation: £35m
We keep getting promised big things and nothing changes.
After the rom sale we'll be a net spend of nothing. Happy to float around 7th spot and wondering why lukaku didn't want to stick around and play with the mediocrity.
We've had chance after chance to spend big and bring in a big name - same as city when they had no champs league - offer the money and they will come.
Every day that passes I'm more convinced he's here for the stadium return and that's it.
After the rom sale we'll be a net spend of nothing. Happy to float around 7th spot and wondering why lukaku didn't want to stick around and play with the mediocrity.
We've had chance after chance to spend big and bring in a big name - same as city when they had no champs league - offer the money and they will come.
Every day that passes I'm more convinced he's here for the stadium return and that's it.
Hi mate.
The whole point is that the charge that has been cleared related to next years (17/18) basic payment and the "stabiliser payment" for 16/17. Basically these charges cover income spanning about 21 months from the date of registration.
The PL announced a while back that this model of funding had to be changed from 18/19 to a regulated lender, the reason they used 18/19 being the time lag in the charge imho.
The JGF charge (now RMF) is still registered as either there is money outstanding to RMF, or EFC "forgot" to discharge it. I think the former the most likely tbh.
Welcome
Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.
Shop
