Farhad Moshiri

[Damo W]

He sat on the board of directors, he was not a company director. He had the same influence and power within the board room as his fellow board members.

I'm failing to see your point.

Yes I would agree from a day to day executive board he had the say.

However as he was not a director he could not insist on attending formal meetings of the board of the directors. A different concept from a day to day executive board which is not written into company law whilst meetings of the board of directors are. He could only ever be invited to meetings of the Board of directors and would have had limited say at such meetings. I have seen numerous private companies ran like this.

My point is therefore his influance has increased as he is now a chief exec and director a very different concept from chief executive employee.

 

[Foot Long Hot Dog]

Yes I would agree from a day to day executive board he had the say.

However as he was not a director he could not insist on attending formal meetings of the board of the directors. A different concept from a day to day executive board which is not written into company law whilst meetings of the board of directors are. He could only ever be invited to meetings of the Board of directors and would have had limited say at such meetings. I have seen numerous private companies ran like this.

My point is therefore his influance has increased as he is now a chief exec and director a very different concept from chief executive employee.

What part of - he was on the board already - are you struggling with mate?

 

[kithnou]

Why are people focussing on Elstone and not the other bloke? Sweet Lord lads, wake up, get over yourselves and the hatred for all things Elstone.
There's a new Sheriff in town and things are changing quickly.

 

[The Esk]

Yes I would agree from a day to day executive board he had the say.

However as he was not a director he could not insist on attending formal meetings of the board of the directors. A different concept from a day to day executive board which is not written into company law whilst meetings of the board of directors are. He could only ever be invited to meetings of the Board of directors and would have had limited say at such meetings. I have seen numerous private companies ran like this.

My point is therefore his influance has increased as he is now a chief exec and director a very different concept from chief executive employee.

Sorry mate but you are talking nonsense.

The conduct of board meetings is almost entirely unregulated by the Companies Act.

There is only one statutory provision for "the board" and that is in the proper keeping of records and minutes ( CA 2006, section 248).

Board meetings are regulated by the articles of association of the company, there's no "day to day executive board" at Everton.

 

[orly]

Sorry mate but you are talking nonsense.

The conduct of board meetings is almost entirely unregulated by the Companies Act.

There is only one statutory provision for "the board" and that is in the proper keeping of records and minutes ( CA 2006, section 248).

Board meetings are regulated by the articles of association of the company, there's no "day to day executive board" at Everton.

Now pipe down Damo ... the other Damo, that is

 

[Foot Long Hot Dog]

Sorry mate but you are talking nonsense.

The conduct of board meetings is almost entirely unregulated by the Companies Act.

There is only one statutory provision for "the board" and that is in the proper keeping of records and minutes ( CA 2006, section 248).

Board meetings are regulated by the articles of association of the company, there's no "day to day executive board" at Everton.

They may not share an IP, but it's safe to say they have now shared exactly the same experience lol

 

[hibbo'sclass]

@The Esk enjoy mate - I can't be bothered responding any more. Keep the faith.

 

[peteblue]

Yes I would agree from a day to day executive board he had the say.

However as he was not a director he could not insist on attending formal meetings of the board of the directors. A different concept from a day to day executive board which is not written into company law whilst meetings of the board of directors are. He could only ever be invited to meetings of the Board of directors and would have had limited say at such meetings. I have seen numerous private companies ran like this.

My point is therefore his influance has increased as he is now a chief exec and director a very different concept from chief executive employee.

Name 3 of these companies.......

 

[JAYTALITY]

What's the up with the Elstone hate. He gets Everton. He's knowledge is invaluable.
(microwaves popcorn)

 

[peteblue]

What's the up with the Elstone hate. He gets Everton. He's knowledge is invaluable.
(microwaves popcorn)

If Moshiri likes him, he's in, if he doesn't, he's out......and that's it........

 

[Librarian]

ratified is just a weird word on its own don't you think.

Ratified - the best man got ratified and tried to goose the brides mother; ratified.

 

[blueboy1664]

Someone who saw that Kitbag deal go down mate. That's all I need to know about Elstone.

Oh, that and the Annex. And everything else.

Unless you know the exact t&c of any contract you opinion lacks substance. Making assumptions is wrong. To remove elstone at this early stage would be madness. He will be knowledgable of day to day business, this will allow any newcomer to assess, develop strategies and improve effectively with limited impact on day to day affairs.

Take a deep breath, enjoy the semis and watch the good times unfold...... with or without elstone. Time will tell

 

[Damo W]

Sorry mate but you are talking nonsense.

The conduct of board meetings is almost entirely unregulated by the Companies Act.

There is only one statutory provision for "the board" and that is in the proper keeping of records and minutes ( CA 2006, section 248).

Board meetings are regulated by the articles of association of the company, there's no "day to day executive board" at Everton.

I will pipe down, ha ha. Apologies @The Esk I strayed from my original thought and observation which was why our CE of a number of years was only now just made a director.

 

[peteblue]

Unless you know the exact t&c of any contract you opinion lacks substance. Making assumptions is wrong. To remove elstone at this early stage would be madness. He will be knowledgable of day to day business, this will allow any newcomer to assess, develop strategies and improve effectively with limited impact on day to day affairs.

Take a deep breath, enjoy the semis and watch the good times unfold...... with or without elstone. Time will tell

This is the mistake Moyes made at Utd, got rid of all those who knew how the club worked and brought in his own, the rest is history. Continuity and improvement is key. It may take a bit of time but the signs are good.......

 

[joey_macmo]

The issue for me isn't that Elstone hasn't been sacked it's that his position appears to have strengthened slightly.