If the Board were having to do things that they disagreed with, they could just resign. When you say we could have built BMD at any time in our history then why didn’t we ? If you have no money banks or other investors will not loan you any because you are a bigger risk. Moshiri had money and access to Usmanov. If Moshiri hadn’t come along, Bill would have continued his fairy stories and kept his train set. We would still be looking at many many more years at a 40,000 crumbling stadium. Why did Man City get picked up by the Sheiks, the fact that the stadium was already in place certainly aided it.
I’m not trying to defend Moshiri, because he certainly made mistakes, but blithely ignoring the role of the Board in all this and suggesting they were just patsy’s is a blinkered view imo……….
The board of directors are appointed by the majority Shareholders, the majority shareholder is their boss, their job is to execute the decisions of the shareholders, not the other way around. They were complicit to be sure and getting paid - it was their job, its feasible that concerns may be or may not be raised - but ultimately its the majority shareholder who instructs. This theory that Moshiri was led astray is a facilely, its all his decisions that have led us to to this point. As has happened ultimately, the board are employees appointed to be functionaries for the shareholders will, ultimately they paid are employees - like everyone who works their ultimate aim is their own financial gain at the end of the day.
We have, we have constantly reviewed numerous projects for feasibility in the last 30 years, the closest were the KD and Kirkby, ultimately a risk analysis, i suspect meant it would put the club at risk by over extending itself and decided not to progress. This owner has decided to over extend itself and put the club at risk. i mean that happening today.
Im not sure you can say a PL club or indeed a football club cant get credit to build - there are many examples above and below us in the table. In fact the accusation you make on access to finance is part of the problem Moshiri has created, he cant get access to finance, hes toxic because of his association with sanctioned individuals and concerns about him being sanctioned and his access to funds - thus he has mortgaged our future on debts he cant pay back. If MSP decide they can take control of BMD at the end of May unless, they are paid back and the club looses control of the ground.
I dont know what point you are making on the Moshiri Vs Bill trainset thing - the two arent mutually exclusive they were working together until Bills health faded last year (RIP), it certainly wasnt one or the other.
Again its not binary - Moshiri or the board - one or the other.
I dont think people understand the dynamic of the majority shareholder and the board. The board are functionaires of the majority shareholder - they are there to carry out thier insructions and mangage that operation. In terms of decsion making, the majoirty of the share holder makes the decisions - they arent ever led astray - this is th ebit i feel our fan base have confused by for a couple of years.
Everything, hardship, adversity etc we are living through is down to our Majority shareholder Moshiri.
He is to blame for it all. It baffles me that people fight his corner and proportion almost all of the blame elsewhere.