Farhad Moshiri

[Moomin]

Hostage negotiator expert, counter terrorism expert. Also expert knowledge on nuclear power station's suffering damage from earth quakes.

Someone link that up, the Japan earth quake thread.

I'll go and find it.

https://www.grandoldteam.com/forum/threads/japan-earthquake-tsunami.34428/page-3

 

[bizzaro]

Sorry mate, I'm losing what you are trying to argue here - yes the Chairman has wider responsibilities because the Chairman through common law and the AoA can do things other directors cannot do, we all understand that, but what else are you arguing?

If you are arguing that Bill still has power to determine when Martinez is fired, then that is simply not the case

I am not arguing that. I'm arguing that if Bill was 'protecting' Martinez as some speculated and that Moshiri wanted him gone. But Bill was blocking this with 3 to 2 votes on the board and his deciding vote

Then I'm saying Moshiri really could take multiple steps to rectify this. (both in the articles of association, companies act and English Common Law).

However, we both know this ISN'T happening. Thats the point

 

[orly]

I clicked on the last page mate. Are you saying I should go back a few pages and read?
Don't play with me now....

Definitely worth it.

What is good value GOT?

-quality gifs
-high quality knowledge and then also mental stuff
-borderline tolerance of the massively off-topic
- @bizzaro

All there, all worth enjoying

 

[hibbo'sclass]

A shareholder can request the company take action against a board member they believe are acting improperly or do so themselves if the company will not. However, proper legal advice is required to do this.

A so called 'unfair prejudice action'

S994 (1),CA 2006 and the defence is that the director had reasonable belief that they were not acting in a prejudicial manner.
It is a petition to the court, and requires court approval to proceed I think. Oh wait, that's what I said before isn't it.

 

[The Esk]

I am not arguing that. I'm arguing that if Bill was 'protecting' Martinez as some speculated and that Moshiri wanted him gone. But Bill was blocking this with 3 to 2 votes on the board and his deciding vote

Then I'm saying Moshiri really could take multiple steps to rectify this. (both in the articles of association, companies act and English Common Law).

However, we both know this ISN'T happening. Thats the point

Fair enough - in agreement

 

[bizzaro]

Exactly, GOT at it's best and @bizzaro plays a key role.

Takes two to tango mate.

 

[orly]

Fair enough - in agreement

HE HAS DONE IT

SCENES

 

[nsno-chris]

Went round the houses but you got there eventually

 

[bizzaro]

S994 (1),CA 2006 and the defence is that the director had reasonable belief that they were not acting in a prejudicial manner.
It is a petition to the court, and requires court approval to proceed I think. Oh wait, that's what I said before isn't it.

No mate. I do not believe you did.

 

[hibbo'sclass]

I am not arguing that. I'm arguing that if Bill was 'protecting' Martinez as some speculated and that Moshiri wanted him gone. But Bill was blocking this with 3 to 2 votes on the board and his deciding vote

Then I'm saying Moshiri really could take multiple steps to rectify this. (both in the articles of association, companies act and English Common Law).

However, we both know this ISN'T happening. Thats the point

No, that is what I first theorised about including remedies.
You've spent most of the evening talking in vague terms about me being incorrect, and have finally stated what I said in my initial post.

 

[The Esk]

Definitely worth it.

What is good value GOT?

-quality gifs
-high quality knowledge and then also mental stuff
-borderline tolerance of the massively off-topic
- @bizzaro

All there, all worth enjoying

Wonderful summary

 

[bizzaro]

No, that is what I first theorised about including remedies.
You've spent most of the evening talking in vague terms about me being incorrect, and have finally stated what I said in my initial post.

Are you saying I was not acting in good faith?

 

[tommye]

Are you saying I was not acting in good faith?

 

[Foot Long Hot Dog]

Are you saying I was not acting in good faith?

I think he was suggesting that you were talking out of your hoop mate.

But nicely.......

 

[hibbo'sclass]

No mate. I do not believe you did.

So the bit about requiring court approval for a shareholder action, then more specifically that a s994 requires approval were figments of my imagination.