Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

 

Farhad Moshiri

7+ Years On... Your Verdict On Farhad Moshiri

  • Pleased

    Votes: 107 7.7%
  • Disappointed

    Votes: 1,290 92.3%

  • Total voters
    1,397
Apologies, yes an unrelated third party could with the agreement of BHHL (assuming BHHL exercises their options) acquire the whole Club by using that strategy.

However Moshiri would then be left with no ownership of Everton.

A very unlikely scenario.
do you not think Moshiri has some backing not Usmanov just someone else?
 
;)
Apologies, yes an unrelated third party could with the agreement of BHHL (assuming BHHL exercises their options) acquire the whole Club by using that strategy.

However Moshiri would then be left with no ownership of Everton.

A very unlikely scenario.
TBH my post was pure mischief whilst waiting for Windows 10 to install so I could in-install it.
 
do you not think Moshiri has some backing not Usmanov just someone else?

I think if Moshiri wishes to bring other investors in (and he has not indicated such) he would have a large number of suitors to chose from. The club with a designated site for a new stadium and with planning permission is obviously more valuable than without.

However I stress there is no indication that is his intention.
 

That's interesting, it either suggests there was competition for his stake, or the valuation by Forbes was on the low side.

I'll have a look later at their valuation model.
Probably too simplistic, but Arsenal shares bid and offer prices per FT were 14 and 17k.
So mid market about 15.5k, published price 15.75k.
If no other assets held within R&W then a rough valuation of the assets would be approx:-
15.75×9.3475 k= 147,223,125.

Reported sale was worth about 200mil, so are the papers wrong or was a 30ish % premium paid on the basis of future income streams.

Don't know, but the cavaet is the reported price could include other assets or could be plain wrong like the valuation of EFC at £225mil when the Kansas lads were the subject of takeover rumours.
 
It's very unlikely a Court would see a scheme of arrangement as necessary given the requirement to have the agreement of 75% of the shares not held by the bidder for the scheme to be approved.

If Moshiri approached the court already owning or having the right of ownership to 75% (approx) the court (in fact his own lawyers prior to approach in the court) would point out that 90% is a lower threshold than 75% plus 75% of the remaining 25%.

If we ignore his options agreement and just look at his existing holdings (I'm not sure we can ignore the options agreeement but for the purposes of this, in theory) the threshold by going via a scheme of arrangement drops slightly to 87.5%.

just read this mate, a couple of times digested it and had a good think about it I still haven't fec what it all means.
 
I think if Moshiri wishes to bring other investors in (and he has not indicated such) he would have a large number of suitors to chose from. The club with a designated site for a new stadium and with planning permission is obviously more valuable than without.

However I stress there is no indication that is his intention.
Do you think the appointment of Mr Ryazantsev is contra-indicative of seeking new investors, and suggests external financing options for the stadium?
 


Welcome to GrandOldTeam

Get involved. Registration is simple and free.

Back
Top