Farhad Moshiri

7+ Years On... Your Verdict On Farhad Moshiri

  • Pleased

    Votes: 110 7.8%

  • Disappointed

    Votes: 1,298 92.2%
  • Total voters
    1,408
The Esk said:
Apologies, yes an unrelated third party could with the agreement of BHHL (assuming BHHL exercises their options) acquire the whole Club by using that strategy.

However Moshiri would then be left with no ownership of Everton.

A very unlikely scenario.
Click to expand...
do you not think Moshiri has some backing not Usmanov just someone else?
 

;)
The Esk said:
Apologies, yes an unrelated third party could with the agreement of BHHL (assuming BHHL exercises their options) acquire the whole Club by using that strategy.

However Moshiri would then be left with no ownership of Everton.

A very unlikely scenario.
Click to expand...
TBH my post was pure mischief whilst waiting for Windows 10 to install so I could in-install it.
 
everton280 said:
do you not think Moshiri has some backing not Usmanov just someone else?
Click to expand...

I think if Moshiri wishes to bring other investors in (and he has not indicated such) he would have a large number of suitors to chose from. The club with a designated site for a new stadium and with planning permission is obviously more valuable than without.

However I stress there is no indication that is his intention.
 

The Esk said:
That's interesting, it either suggests there was competition for his stake, or the valuation by Forbes was on the low side.

I'll have a look later at their valuation model.
Click to expand...
Probably too simplistic, but Arsenal shares bid and offer prices per FT were 14 and 17k.
So mid market about 15.5k, published price 15.75k.
If no other assets held within R&W then a rough valuation of the assets would be approx:-
15.75×9.3475 k= 147,223,125.

Reported sale was worth about 200mil, so are the papers wrong or was a 30ish % premium paid on the basis of future income streams.

Don't know, but the cavaet is the reported price could include other assets or could be plain wrong like the valuation of EFC at £225mil when the Kansas lads were the subject of takeover rumours.
 
The Esk said:
It's very unlikely a Court would see a scheme of arrangement as necessary given the requirement to have the agreement of 75% of the shares not held by the bidder for the scheme to be approved.

If Moshiri approached the court already owning or having the right of ownership to 75% (approx) the court (in fact his own lawyers prior to approach in the court) would point out that 90% is a lower threshold than 75% plus 75% of the remaining 25%.

If we ignore his options agreement and just look at his existing holdings (I'm not sure we can ignore the options agreeement but for the purposes of this, in theory) the threshold by going via a scheme of arrangement drops slightly to 87.5%.
Click to expand...

just read this mate, a couple of times digested it and had a good think about it I still haven't fec what it all means.
 
The Esk said:
I think if Moshiri wishes to bring other investors in (and he has not indicated such) he would have a large number of suitors to chose from. The club with a designated site for a new stadium and with planning permission is obviously more valuable than without.

However I stress there is no indication that is his intention.
Click to expand...
Do you think the appointment of Mr Ryazantsev is contra-indicative of seeking new investors, and suggests external financing options for the stadium?
 


Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Register

Shop

Back
Top