That's not a specific charge, that's a general allegation.
Actually you're both wrong; 3.4 is the power to refer to a commission. [ though it's implicit there is a substantive allegation]
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's not a specific charge, that's a general allegation.
I'm not wrong about anything there. That's a general statement laying out the commission's powers. Nothing to specifically do with our case.Actually you're both wrong; 3.4 is the power to refer to a commission. [ though it's implicit there is a substantive allegation]
View attachment 207979
You said it was a "general allegation" an allegation would surely be the equivalent of a charge. W 3.4 is instead the part of the contract which gives the board the power refer to a commission.I'm not wrong about anything there. That's a general statement laying out the commission's powers. Nothing to specifically do with our case.
Surely a subject such as this wouldn't interest them??Which other one? There are several suspicious posters on the thread.
Did reading got 6 points a while back with another 6 points suspended in case of new breach of ffp? We do not want any points deduction.we will get similar to reading I reckon a suspended points deduction to begin with and if there any future breaches then an actual points deduction
Did reading got 6 points a while back with another 6 points suspended in case of new breach of ffp? We do not want any points deduction.
The last 3 years.I dont think you're right there mate. What 3 years are you using?
And going into a commission what does the club have to gain from stating EFC are "compliant with all of the Premier League's financial rules and regulations"?
There's been some agreement with the PL on what they can claim in terms of deductions. And it's up to the PL to determine what it allows for deductions and by reasonably how much.
You, me and no one else are privvy to those discussions they club had with the PL, but they will emerge in any commission.
Isn't our great friend kia joorabchian involved with readingDid reading got 6 points a while back with another 6 points suspended in case of new breach of ffp? We do not want any points deduction.
Reading initially got accused in 2021 of Breaching limits. Their adjusted losses were £57-58m to 2021 set against a limit of £39m so yes they breached it.They were given a 'business plan' to follow by the EFL, essentially a budget limit and they broke it.
Certainly is. A friend of the owner I have been told and also a friend of that Marina exec at Chelsea whose surname I can't spell without checking. Which has assisted them in respect of loans such as Rahman, Drinkwater and that Chelsea midfielder this year at a massive discount or for free. Reading fan I know says he's seen Kia in their Directors Box a free times.Isn't our great friend kia joorabchian involved with reading
Oh friend of the stars you! These were before my time, but I'm open minded. I actually work with an Everton fan who lives down here, Everton seem a pretty decent club in many ways.Bristol City eh?
If I told you Tom Ritchie was our postman for years, and I shared a joint with Alan Walsh at a party, would you believe me?
To be fair you combine the £139.9m and 121.3m ie add them then hence so about £130.2mThe last 3 years.
19/20 139.9m lost
20/21 121.3m lost
21/22 44.7m lost
286 million lost in 3 years. The limit is 105. COVID and whatever nonsense you suggested doesn't come near to touching that figure.
It's all there https://www.evertonfc.com/club/shareholders/statement-of-accounts