Sigurdsson did better on Saturday, but the article pointing out why he was so good, and therefore why they can't understand why he has been getting stick, doesn't make sense. He's been getting stick because he hasn't been doing what he did on Saturday, notably, shooting.
He has been anonymous in the aspect for some time, and even when he has, it has been lacklustre. To the point whereby some kid behind us shouted as he approached to take the penalty, "He'll hit the wall".
Everton have very rarely had someone with the ability, or at least the inclination, to shoot from long range for a long time, while other teams generally have several, and it's those moments of brilliance that can be the difference in breaking teams down. The last person to score a free kick for us was Lukaku. The only other player at the club to score a free kick is Baines, and last time he scored was Lukakus debut against West Ham (albeit he scored 2 and both were peaches).
When we signed Sigurdsson, i believed we had finally signed someone who could be that difference maker, and he showed glimpses of what he could do last year, but far too infrequently, which is all the more frustrating in games when we have struggled, that someone with his skill set has stood idly by and not took the responsibility to provide us with that ability to break a deadlock. And its not like he's tried and been unlucky, a lot of the time he simply hasn't even tried.
On Saturday, he broke the deadlock with a sublime bit of skill out of nothing. Sometimes that can be the difference between winning a game, and losing as the crowds toxic frustration slowly takes hold and we capitulate. Even taking the shot and narrowly missing often gives the crowd a lift. It's not rocket science.
Hopefully these goals combined with the growing confidence of the team can see a turnabout in fortunes, both individually and collectively. And him finally taking responsibility is an important step in the right direction.