Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
At least the Labour Party have waited until after the referendum to rip themselves apart in public and get a new leader, the Tories used the referendum campaign itself for that.
Based on what? A war cry? Really? That was the price he paid for his conscience and soul.
It has become abundantly clear, over the past two months, that Corbyn does not resonate with the voting public. You must realise that Corbyn would not win a general election.
That speech was actually evil.
Give him a General Election. Miliband had one, so did Brown. They lost. Corbyn deserves one crack too.
That speech was actually evil.
But what is clear is that he would lose very badly. I'm struggling to think of a labour government this far to the left that has won an election? All those that have won were more center left.
How is it clear? I keep seeing this but those May elections aren't proof enough for me, especially considering Miliband and Brown had similar hiccups on the way to their GE.
Take away Blair's tory-lite and you have to go back 40 years to the last time Labour won an election.
Give Jeremy a chance at least.
Because he wanted to destroy a terrorist organisation?
Shame on him for that like...
Evil hahaha
yeah very funny...that speech encouraged more of this:
Nearly 90 Percent Of People Killed In Recent Drone Strikes Were Not The Target
41 men targeted but 1,147 people killed:
drone strikes kill innocents 90% of the time
Exactly. That's why I think he would lose badly. It's been proven that Britain is not a hugely left wing country. Will veer somewhat to the left with a suitable leader (which blair ultimately was not I accept) and some good policies, but is not going to vote for Corbyn in a million years. You win general elections by appealing across the board.
I can't think of a government which was elected on a platform like Jeremy Corybn's.
he said he was aware airstrikes kill civilians, but the aim isn't to do so. Meanwhile, ISIS were butchering people with the aim to kill civilians and burying them in mass graves.
Also, at the time we already did airstrikes in Iraq; Benn's argument was that the border with Syria no longer existed, so we should expand them across to Syria to make the airstrikes effective instead of futile.
I agreed with every word of that speech, not because I'm "evil" and want violence, but because I recognise that sometimes things need to be done for the greater good - and the destruction of ISIS would potentially save many more lives and future conflict than sitting passively and letting ISIS run free would.
Exactly. That's why I think he would lose badly. It's been proven that Britain is not a hugely left wing country. Will veer somewhat to the left with a suitable leader (which blair ultimately was not I accept) and some good policies, but is not going to vote for Corbyn in a million years. You win general elections by appealing across the board.
I can't think of a government which was elected on a platform like Jeremy Corybn's.
Koff lad.a man after my own heart x
fight the good fight, friend
That doesn't mean that we have to accept it.fine words but a fantasy...always has been
That speech was fantastically delivered and received a rapturous reception from both the Tories and large swathes of Labour as well - that in itself should raise alarm bells.That speech was actually evil.
Agreed.Give him a General Election. Miliband had one, so did Brown. They lost. Corbyn deserves one crack too
No, because he wasn't arsed about the continued havoc being wrought upon the region.Because he wanted to destroy a terrorist organisation?
Shame on him for that like...
Evil hahaha
Oh well that's okay then.Yes, and he acknowledges that in his speech, if you actually listened to it.