I disagree, supply the information to the FA and say nothing, the time to talk is AFTER the verdict, class and dignity.
'Talk' after the event.
When Niasse got a ban, even though there were others before who had 'earned the right to go down', we said nothing. We meekly accepted the 'punishment' without a word or words of why wasn't this or that incident looked at.
A week or so later Ramsay goes down and gets a penalty and nothing was really said by Dyche so Ramsay got away with it and Arsenal got 3 points instead of 1. There was not a peep out of our club about why wasn't the Ramsay penalty looked at like Niasse's. The inconsistency and therefore the injustice of retrospective action against Niasse was more evident with Ramsay. When have we ever spoke after an incident and we have been listened to? When have the FA came out and said 'Everton have shown really class and dignity and we apologise to them and their players and supporters for this or that incident that has gone against them'. The Clattenberg derby maybe?
Look at Wenger at the moment all hissy fits and having a go refs. Has he been punished every time? No. What will happen is that a ref will be too intimidated to give a correct decision against Arsenal and they will get an advantage. As has happened in the past most recently the Ramsay 'penalty'. Why do certain teams always get the advantage for them? Manu under Ferguson - was it 'class and dignity'? Doubt it. Was it intimidation of refs and the FA? Undoubtedly. People may say they don't show 'class and dignity' but they help their club gain an advantage and therefore less loses, more wins and more points.
We should do what other clubs do and moan, moan and moan even more if necessary otherwise we are at a disadvantage against certain clubs even before we go on the pitch. Saying nothing has not done us any favours up to now. It has allowed refs and the fa to take the easy way out and penalise our players and club because we have far too often not spoken out about the injustices against us.
Some clubs have a whole host of media pundits to stick up for them whilst we don't. Therefore it is up to the manager even more to highlight incidents including the one against Holgate on Friday at the time. It is up to the manager even more to make sure we are not at a disadvantage including our players, before we go onto the pitch. When asked on Friday after the game about Holgate, Allardyce should have said, 'there is no place in football for racism' followed by 'we are reporting an incident involving Mason Holgate'. That way the issue would be more difficult to brush under the carpet, as a lot of Evetonians think is going to happen. Holgate thinks he was racially abused and acted accordingly and it is up to the club to protect him and not allow it to be covered up. By Allardyce making it a live issue after the game would make that less likely rather than the tame response he gave.
On Friday night Allardyce said he thought it was not a penalty. I take it that the FA will now look at it? Even though all the pundits including Murphy said it wasn't a penalty. Has the club issued a statement today in the 'class and dignity' way 'after the event' questioning why the FA are not looking at Lallana's penalty? And if the FA are not going to take action pointing out the inconsistency of the Niasse decision compared to Lallana's dive?
It is up to the manager to be on his toes so we are not taken advantage of. It is also up to the club to speak up forcefully when we are unduly penalised compared to other clubs when incidents happen e.g Niasse compared to Ramsay or other penalty incidents that went before and since, Lallana's. If the speaking out 'after the verdict' is 'class and dignity' it hasn't got us anywhere so far. Maybe a change of tact is needed.