Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Participation within this subforum is only available to members who have had 5+ posts approved elsewhere.

Home nations. Underachievers?

Biggest underachievers?


  • Total voters
    43
Status
Not open for further replies.
England should have been closer to winning trophies in the 90s and 00s with the players they had available. Strikers like Owen, Shearer, Sheringham, Ferdinand, Fowler, Collymore, Wright, Cole... fast forward a few years and Danny Welbeck's a regular.
 
England should have been closer to winning trophies in the 90s and 00s with the players they had available. Strikers like Owen, Shearer, Sheringham, Ferdinand, Fowler, Collymore, Wright, Cole... fast forward a few years and Danny Welbeck's a regular.

England didn't even qualify for the World Cup in 94 mate.

Was 8 year between World Cups for them.

Mad when you look at the populations and the countries that participated.
 
This is why I voted them. Even Ireland, Northern Ireland and Wales have achieved this. It’s absolutely embarrassing. I didn’t realise that was their record until I just looked it up as research for this thread, thought they might’ve managed it in like the 70s or something when they had Dalglish, Souness, Hansen, Law etc.
Yes in the 70s and 80s they had some decent squads. 1990 was not a bad squad either IIRC. In 86 and 90 it was possible for 3 teams to go through from the group too and they still failed. Despite all their world class players
 

Yeah that’s a fair point I guess. I think it is scotlands biggest sport though

Say you applied Scotlands population limit to England.

England would essentially be picking from half the population of London and they'd still have a bigger pick then Scotland.

Its actually quite incredible that Ireland, Scotland, Wales and prob more NI qualify for any tournaments when you look at it.
 
Say you applied Scotlands population limit to England.

England would essentially be picking from half the population of London and they'd still have a bigger pick then Scotland.

Its actually quite incredible that Ireland, Scotland, Wales and prob more NI qualify for any tournaments when you look at it.

Scotland have loads of players that are included in England’s population though, as do Ireland and Wales? So what is this population limit you speak of?
 
Say you applied Scotlands population limit to England.

England would essentially be picking from half the population of London and they'd still have a bigger pick then Scotland.

Its actually quite incredible that Ireland, Scotland, Wales and prob more NI qualify for any tournaments when you look at it.
Scotlands population dwarves those of Uruguay and Croatia
 

Scotlands population dwarves those of Uruguay and Croatia

Uruguay won the first couple of world Cups mate, when it wasn't a thing and much smaller scope at home, they had relative success recently but not consistently, countries with that and our sized populations will have boom and bust cycles.

Croatia are brill, but lets be frank they are an outlier and given frequency there will always be one - it was even us punching above our weight at one stage. The vast majority are on the opposite side.

Its an anomaly rather then a trend statistically, the evidence is stacked way more on the other side with population the defining variable.
 
How can little old England be expected to compete with China, India, the USA, Brazil, Indonesia, Pakistan and Nigeria when you actually look into the population difference between them? On this evidence we are massively overachieving even getting past the group stages at tournaments.

Resources, and football being our number one sport, with the population we have, with talent from all over the globe coming to our shores every year means we have underachieved.

Cricket is the be all and end all in India and Pakistan.

Nigeria and Indonesia dont have the resources like we do.

USA have four sports more popular than football.

Compare us to Italy, Germany or France, and we've hugely underachieved.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Back
Top