Billy Dean
Player Valuation: £70m
Does any journalist?Noone on it looks physically capable of playing football, always found that bizarre
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Does any journalist?Noone on it looks physically capable of playing football, always found that bizarre
What's "manscaped"", never heard tge word beforeIf you listen to any of the Athletic podcasts it appears the whole operation is funded by manscaped
Hahahaha. Grooming stuff for balls.What's "manscaped"", never heard tge word before
Oh lol, "learn something new every day"Hahahaha. Grooming stuff for balls.
Does any journalist?
Quality has definitely been diluted IMO but still a lot of good stuff in thereWas great when it first started. Took loads of reputable journo's. Im sure it still has quality in there now but feels like as it has grown, it's been watered down a little so now its more quantity than quality.
Some I'm sure are vaguely atheletic ( no pun really). Those at the athletic are scrawny nerds and obviously consider themselves superior to your classic pundit. You have to be okay at football to get it imo and they look like they can't run 100m.
Does that mean none of us can make a valid observation on a PL game or write about it?
I should qualify that the 'none of us' isn't limited to GOT. Obviously we all chat utter wham.Have you read the match day threads?
That's absolute nonsense - a physically disabled person can't 'get' football? You'd have to define what level 'OK at football' is.
99.9% of us aren't 'OK' at football by Premier League standards. Does that mean none of us can make a valid observation on a PL game or write about it?
Do they though? From what I've heard of them on various podcasts throughout the years they, and the Guardianista football writers, generally tend to be quite self deprecating.I wouldn't pay a subscription fee to hear your comments [ oh wait ]. My point is the athletic pundits clearly view their opinions as being superior to ex players in a pretentious way. I wasn't quite having a dig at the disabled in all honesty.
They’ve been instrumental in normalising terminology like “turnovers” and “xg”, enough said.Do they though? From what I've heard of them on various podcasts throughout the years they, and the Guardianista football writers, generally tend to be quite self deprecating.
Quite often what I read and hear from them makes a hell of a lot more sense and ages better than pretty much all TV pundit ex-players.
Which of their writers provokes your ire so much? Which particular articles are you basing your opinion on? Surely you don't instead rely on stereotypes about modern football writers to form a baseless opinion?They’ve been instrumental in normalising terminology like “turnovers” and “xg”, enough said.