Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

 

Confirmed Signing James Rodriguez

Status
Not open for further replies.
What you just described there is a club secretary role. Michael Dunford used to do all that. The only difference between Dunford and Brands is that the former wore M&S slacks and Brands wears designer ripped skinny jeans.

As for: "But Brands thus far has been an outstanding DoF for us aside from a slip here and there such as Iwobi or Delph even"

...or Kean or Gbamin or Mina.
Managers make almighty cockups with signings as well. It’s a completely pointless debate because de facto he is there and doing the role. He is part of some sort of governance process with the manager.
He seems to have more responsibility for signing younger players, which must have been a direction dictated by the owner . He is not operating in isolation, he is part of a process.
 
Seen a few articles that paint it out to be an illogical signing. I can only assume that these writers have not seen us play for the past few seasons?

While it's high-profile and probably quite expensive, it's considerably lower risk than some of our more bizarre signings of late. He's just turned 29, his form has not suffered the dramatic fall off from 2014 that the pundits lazily regurgitate, but above all, he's exactly what the squad has been missing. None of them know how to play football FFS. I don't think we even created a chance from open play post-lockdown.

He might not adjust, or he might be injured more than he's available, but for a 2 to 3 year deal, for £20m(!), with all the marketing and footballing potential he brings, he's about the most logical signing I think we've ever made.
 

Managers make almighty cockups with signings as well. It’s a completely pointless debate because de facto he is there and doing the role. He is part of some sort of governance process with the manager.
He seems to have more responsibility for signing younger players, which must have been a direction dictated by the owner . He is not operating in isolation, he is part of a process.
We've had a DoF-manager 'duopoly' in place for 4 years - it's wasted half a billion quid. Brands is part of that.
 
Seen a few articles that paint it out to be an illogical signing. I can only assume that these writers have not seen us play for the past few seasons?

While it's high-profile and probably quite expensive, it's considerably lower risk than some of our more bizarre signings of late. He's just turned 29, his form has not suffered the dramatic fall off from 2014 that the pundits lazily regurgitate, but above all, he's exactly what the squad has been missing. None of them know how to play football FFS. I don't think we even created a chance from open play post-lockdown.

He might not adjust, or he might be injured more than he's available, but for a 2 to 3 year deal, for £20m(!), with all the marketing and footballing potential he brings, he's about the most logical signing I think we've ever made.

It's worth the risk. For sure.
 


Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Back
Top