Best to just leave it ajar incase we get any injuries.Transfer window about to be gently closed. No need to slam it this time
Best to just leave it ajar incase we get any injuries.Transfer window about to be gently closed. No need to slam it this time
Same age Del was in his first season here, no?Nah, too junior.
I think he will go personally regardless of who we bring in. Can't see him sticking around for no champions league footy.And if the board show ambition
How will the Twitterati spin this tomorrow?
Here's a handy guide
- Only crap clubs do business late
- All hail Ron's ruthlessness
- We always thought the new Everton would balance the books
- ...er except when we said about £100m net spends like...
- 'Some fans still whingeing' (monkey emoji and response from lickspittle @KUEFC09U2 )
- Moshiri making all the right moves etc
I know jack about this sort of stuff but how come we need to sell big to purchase when teams like Palace can splash on Benteke and Cabaye in one window without selling anyone for a meaningful sum?
Dave that's nothing new I have written about it for the last 9 months - we need increased revenue to meet our STCC obligations, not because of a lack of capital.
In the absence of increased revenues we will need annually to create player profits.
Hence my comments earlier about Elstone.
He can pretty much spend what ever he has available this window because of the Stones sale in STCC compliance.
Next summer he can lift wages by £7 million plus increase in commercial revenue plus player trading profits.
Neither I see as facility led, rather than compliance led - facility led suggests a lack of resource to carry out wishes, compliance led means constrained by regulation rather than resources.
It's fairly simple, there are two regulations in play (i) Profit & Sustainability and (ii) STCC (short term cost control)
Profit and Sustainability allows a club to make up to £105 million loss in any three year period subject to the club providing details of how they will fund those losses. Losses do not include expenditure on stadium/infrastructure nor academy development costs.
STCC relates to wages, and permits clubs to increase their wages by £7 million a year from the 2014/15 base, plus any increase in non-broadcasting income. Non-broadcasting income includes the profit from player sales.
Just a word on how a player purchase and a player sale affects profitability. Let's say we buy a player for £30 million on a 3 year contract. That purchase adds £10 million to costs each year over the length of the contract (player depreciation= cost/length of contract)
When we sell a player, the profit calculation is worked out as follows: The player in the example above is sold after 18 months for £45 million. The profit is calculated as follows: Sale price - value on the books (not purchase price). So in this case it is £45m - £15m (30x1.5/3) = £30 million. Thus for STCC purposes £30 million would be available to be added to player wages.
Hope that helps.
Regardless, I'd be amazed if Schneiderlin was the end of our business.
You can though mate, you just keep clicking on the increase offer button, it's dead easy.
Is Kone confirmed
Lukaku is leaving in the summer, we will have to find 2 (if not 3) strikers to bring in, we're also short at the back with additions needed in RB Cover, LB cover and a starting CB. Midfield we look strong but also lack depth in a more advanced Midfield role.
Its going to have to be a busy summer!