January Transfer Window 2023

[blueboy72]

We simply cannot afford that.

It’s a loan to obligation, so they haven’t spent much so far, so to the high fee I’d guess they haven’t even paid a loan fee. We will spend 30/40 mil imo, again that’s not what we would actually hand over, With small down payments and length of deals. We have to spend its as simple as that, we will be in big trouble if we don’t, spend 40mil now or potentially go down and lose 150mil

We also have till the June the 30th to sell a Pickford or Gordon or DCL to balance this years accounts

 

[m hart89 efc]

I’m glad we’ve swerved that cunha fella for that price. He looks a ok player, nowhere near that obligation to buy price though. It’s desperate from wolves, think atleti have had them off there.

Here’s were we go and spend £35m on sarr now instead ?

 

[blueboy72]

Wonder what the obligation condition is for Cunha?

That's an insane amount of money for his record. Could be a potentially great signing for them but a big risk.

He has a Poor goals return, what do you mean condition? An obligation means they have to sign him doesn’t it? Like kean and juve With us.
Like I’ve just said in another post. The high price most likely = small or nothing loan fee.

 

[Zatara]

Wonder what the obligation condition is for Cunha?

That's an insane amount of money for his record. Could be a potentially great signing for them but a big risk.

I posted earlier about Zaha being out of contract in the summer.

Low fee on a 3 year deal to come in as a stopgap while Thelwell rebuilds the rest of the team.

Play him as centre forward when DCL isnt available.

 

[Cool_Blue]

Make it happen Moshiri.

Please, not another over the hill midfielder

 

[Colonel Getafe]

It's a reasonable amount if Ings comes in and gets 10 league goals between Jan and end of the season.

That's something he's easily capable of doing.

How much is staying in the PL worth? A fair bit more than 25M hence why I think it's reasonable given the obvious gap currently in the scoring department.

If Danny Ings scores 10 goals in the second half of the season I'll eat my hat live on ToffeeTV.

Plus I doubt we've got £25m to spend in January, let alone think we'd drop that kind of cash on an injury-prone 30 year old.

 

[blueboy72]

I posted earlier about Zaha being out of contract in the summer.

Low fee on a 3 year deal to come in as a stopgap while Thelwell rebuilds the rest of the team.

Play him as centre forward when Dominic Calvert-Lewin isnt available.

No way palace sell him, add a few injuries on top and they could easily be in a relegation battle. Not worth even 30/40mil to them, unless. They go out and buy, but their philosophy is but young, so a risk to sell their best player With huge prem experience and replace with a kid from abroad or the championship

 

[andy4efc]

He has a Poor goals return, what do you mean condition? An obligation means they have to sign him doesn’t it? Like kean and juve With us.
Like I’ve just said in another post. The high price most likely = small or nothing loan fee.

Obligation means there is a set condition that gets met for the transfer to trigger. Usually games played and so forth. Seemed to be a very italian thing that's spread across europe.

Could be games played, or whatever.

So for example if we loaned Wan Bissaka from United, and we HAD to buy him if he made 15 appearances, that would be the condition.

 

[blueboy72]

If Danny Ings scores 10 goals in the second half of the season I'll eat my hat live on ToffeeTV.

Plus I doubt we've got £25m to spend in January, let alone think we'd drop that kind of cash on an injury-prone 30 year old.

I sound like a broken record but we have to spend, be crazy not to. Ok maybe we buy one and loan one, but we want 2 forwards apparently and if we have less than 25mil we’re basically getting 2 forwards worse than Maupay

 

[blueboy72]

Obligation means there is a set condition that gets met for the transfer to trigger. Usually games played and so forth. Seemed to be a very italian thing that's spread across europe.

Could be games played, or whatever.

So for example if we loaned Wan Bissaka from United, and we HAD to buy him if he made 15 appearances, that would be the condition.

Ok thanks , I would imagine the target is pretty easy to hit from Atletico’s point of view, I read that the juve kean deal was them
Getting top 4? What ever it was it Looks like it was met as the deal looks as good as done.

 

[Colonel Getafe]

I'm afraid I disagree. What is it they say, never go back? This isn’t even a quick fix, he’s been poor and well off the pace imo.

Have to agree with you here. We spent over a month trying to get the Gana deal all signed and sealed, and he's been poor from the first minute. He was great for us first time round, but he just looks a shadow of his former self, and now we're stuck with a passenger for 18 months on big money.

 

[Zatara]

No way palace sell him, add a few injuries on top and they could easily be in a relegation battle. Not worth even 30/40mil to them, unless. They go out and buy, but their philosophy is but young, so a risk to sell their best player With huge prem experience and replace with a kid from abroad or the championship

As i wrote, his contract expires in the summer.

Theres no way they dont accept a £20mil offer in Jan.

 

[Zatara]

Have to agree with you here. We spent over a month trying to get the Gana deal all signed and sealed, and he's been poor from the first minute. He was great for us first time round, but he just looks a shadow of his former self, and now we're stuck with a passenger for 18 months on big money.

Agreed. However, i think if he had Onana next to him in a double pivot he'd not be as exposed.

 

[Colonel Getafe]

I sound like a broken record but we have to spend, be crazy not to. Ok maybe we buy one and loan one, but we want 2 forwards apparently and if we have less than 25mil we’re basically getting 2 forwards worse than Maupay

I agree, we definitely need 2 attackers, but we can only spend whats available and I dont expect that to be a big figure in midseason. I'd have no problem with us dropping £25m on the right player, I just dont think Danny Ings is the answer, certainly not for anywhere near that kind of figure.

 

[blueboy72]

As i wrote, his contract expires in the summer.

Theres no way they dont accept a £20mil offer in Jan.

100% they won’t , they gain nothing from selling him apart from 20mil and then lose 100 and there best young players on the cheap if they go down