Thats actually completely wrong. All the EU countries know fully what the consequences were.
No one in the UK has died in relation to Chernobyl.
The main consequence was economic. Particularly for agriculture Davek, since certain products were excluded from the food chain.
Source:
from the WHO/IAEA/UNDP Press Release that accompanied the 600-page September 2005 report, written jointly by 8 UN specialized agencies, including the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), World Health Organization (WHO), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UN-OCHA), United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR), and the World Bank, as well as the governments of Belarus, the Russian Federation and Ukraine.
‘As of mid-2005, however, fewer than 50 deaths had been directly attributed to radiation from the disaster, almost all being highly exposed rescue workers…..’
Possible deaths in total? ‘A total of up to 4000 people could eventually die of radiation exposure from the Chernobyl nuclear power plant …. an international team of more than 100 scientists has concluded.’
Even looking at long term chronic affects and Environmental impact assessments aside from the 30km Ukranian exposure, the net impact was low.
The likes of Greenpeace and other NGO's would always disagree with anything published. Thats because they will try and change laws where politicians won't through LITIGATION (the courts).
This was why I was talking about litigation last week. Despite being criticised for it
Litigation will get further safety standards and methods implemented after this.