billyblue80
Player Valuation: £70m
Not convinced they willIts 50/50 for me.
It all depends if United wanna actually make a proper bid.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not convinced they willIts 50/50 for me.
It all depends if United wanna actually make a proper bid.
Which is fine with a few add ons it's 70m. I would rather he didn't but I also don't see United going to that we shall see...If they offer £65m he’s gone.
Because as far as I know we’re still running a loss on the P&L every year unless we sell playersWhy do you think we need the money?
People seem to think now that Danny F is in the hot seat things are different and they might be, when he actually enters the hot seat, till then.Because as far as I know we’re still running a loss on the P&L every year unless we sell players
Has no chance of being accepted- but they keep trying. It tells you all you need to know about the intention behind their ‘bids.’
People seem to think now that Danny F is in the hot seat things are different and they might be, when he actually enters the hot seat, till then.
As well as the near £200m debt to 777, Everton owe Cheshire-based lender Rights and Media Funding (RMF) £225m ($287m) and another £158m ($202m) to MSP. RMF's debt is secured against the club's assets, while MSP's collateral is club subsidiary that owns Everton's new stadium at Bramley-Moore Dock.
Everton has paid about £30m in interest charges to an opaque lender associated with a tax exile, corporate records suggest.
The charges appear to have reached about £438,000 a week, according to the troubled Premier League club’s most recent set of accounts, a figure more than three times the reported wages of the Everton and England goalkeeper Jordan Pickford.
It has, I was going to edit that bit out, cos I know I will now get 50 replies saying the same, but that is indeed on me.Hasn't The £158m been paid off by Friedkin ?
Yeah that’s not the difficult part.Yep, unsettle the player, Branthwaite is on something like £35000 a week Man United apparently offered him £160,000 a week, of course he is going to agree terms.
Yeah that’s not the difficult part.
45 million is absurd given what Kilman fetched. I don’t know what the number the club have but if the Friedken deal goes through our cash needs are likely allayed for the short term and we have 12 more months to figure out any PSR issues (with a much better cost structure than the past 4 years).
If the number gets closer to 70 then you take it as again, it’s likely he’ll never be worth more.
If you hold him a year, he’s so young his value only drops if he falls flat on his face, which is unlikely given our manager and style of play.
I don’t think any of the financing or equity is really even at issue here. I’m pretty sure we’re just losing money purely on the operating side.It has, I was going to edit that bit out, cos I know I will now get 50 replies saying the same, but that is indeed on me.
I think the RMF loan is the issue tho, I doubt the repayments were high on the MSP loan, it was basically a "bridging" loan from some "friends".
Because as far as I know we’re still running a loss on the P&L every year unless we sell players
Due to Stadium and loan repayments.I don’t think any of the financing or equity is really even at issue here. I’m pretty sure we’re just losing money purely on the operating side.
The MSP and 777 were/are bridging loans from some not so friendly folks.It has, I was going to edit that bit out, cos I know I will now get 50 replies saying the same, but that is indeed on me.
I think the RMF loan is the issue tho, I doubt the repayments were high on the MSP loan, it was basically a "bridging" loan from some "friends".