macst
Player Valuation: £1.5m
They won't say a word until it's the
"The club has agreed to sell John Stones to Chelsea for (x fee)."
That'll be it.
With "x" = undisclosed so we have no idea how much of it is siphoned off.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They won't say a word until it's the
"The club has agreed to sell John Stones to Chelsea for (x fee)."
That'll be it.
Why? Because he's English? I don't rate him any higher than mangalawe have to demand his value i think we know they know (thats why they want him) he going to be best CB in the league even if hes isnt already so if man city pay £35M for Mangala we should demand £50M
Let's burn his shirt like Stevie and Torres lads.
You looking forward to your ban mate?@davek agreed here
Great timing btw.
Remind me again who we play next?
I understand that but that facts are every clubs a selling club apart from a couple.
If he goes,anywhere but Chelski,tell them they are the last club we would sell him to.
It is wrong, already. The clue is in it being John Stones putting a transfer request in for John Stones.
I have this on good authority from a reliable source.
I've told you already.
I stake my reputation that he's not going to be sold.
I'm that confident.
I've even said ban me Woolly if he is
I wouldn't put it past our board, but it's a brave move if Stones has gone along with it, because he must realise the hatred and abuse that would be coming his way.
Wonder if he will play tomorrow night with the potential of making him cup tied if he does move.
Why City still met Liverpool's asking price for Sterling.Not a chance are they going above £34m for him now. I still wouldn't sell him, it'd have to be £35m AFTER Barnsley's cut for me.