No mate you said you would leave it Stones wanted to leave. So why move the goalposts?Read the below.
Be a man of your word and take the punishment of being an ITK liar. The forum will have more respect for you.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No mate you said you would leave it Stones wanted to leave. So why move the goalposts?Read the below.
Just because people keep forgetting due to Chelsea's insesent prattling
EFC have told all John Stones is not for sale at any price this summer.
Chelsea simply ignored the message repeatedly given by EFC and tried to unsettle Stones via the media.
But that is what EFC communicated all the way along.
I have this on good authority from a reliable source.
I confirmed who the sauce is to a reliable mod.
It's confidential to that mod and myself.
I stand by it. As it's true. Hence @Woolly Blue can ban me if it turns out not to be.
Chelsea's conduct has been there for all to see. But even if they succeeded in unsettling the player he won't be sold. Everton have made that clear.
Chelsea just haven't grasped they have no power here at all.
Didn't you offer the mods @Woolly Blue @the esk to ban you for 30 days if Stones handed a transfer request in mate?
He has not been sold as yet!
I doubt it very much if he has rocked the boat!I hope Martinez plays him tomorrow.
I agree 100%I think the devil's advocacy option is the correct pick. Cognitive dissonance is an emotive nuance that often finds sardonic release via such avenue.
Guys he did refuse to join wigan (in which he would have more opportunities to play) to join everton. A bigger club, that has always been on the back of my mind since the first bid from Chelsea.
Let go if you love the forum @bizzaro.Every cloud I suppose.
And they get a small fine if it's proven to have happened.....which it won't be.Said this meself after the chelsea bid last week . Now I would not expect anything less than the club reporting this to the FA & Premier league .
All the evidence is there to throw the book at them.This has left us in a horrendous position ,Mourhino & chelsea should be charged for ilegal tapping.
Absolute dispicable behavior , if this board dont do something they will lose any shred of respect the fans have for them.....God this hurts.
But why would they do it if the board were trying to sell them anyway? like is being implied.
Trust your opinion as u see him play most. I suppose wel see. Difficult to know as mostrich weeks he plays against one striker most weeks when teams park the bus n celtic have most of the ball. 12M n works out would be idealIm a celtic supporter as well as a blue. Watch all matches and travel to some. Van Dijk is quality. Solid defender. Strong excellent in the air good control. Would be a good fill in for stones. As good as stones is now. Obviously not near as good as stones will be in couple years. Think celtic will cash in on him even if they qualify. Much better than the likes of Johnny evans.
He's a great passer of the ball but has lots of work on his defending to be at the top. Anywhere above 30m is good enough for me.Pffft!
Only if he learns how to defend first.
He's a good distributor. That's it.
If we get near £40M for him we've mugged Chelsea. It's just a pity it didn't happen a month ago.
Is it clear though?
If they wanted to sell, why reject the bids out of hand, and why say he's not up for sale?
On the face of it, the club have rejected offers, said he's not for sale, and the player has handed a transfer request in.
To me that looks bad on Stones as opposed to Everton.