I still can't work out how it bounced as it did. It would only happen to us that.
Exactly.
Regardless of the mistake, it hits the crossbar twice, yet somehow stays in play and falls right on Origi's head.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I still can't work out how it bounced as it did. It would only happen to us that.
It is purely an error in judgement. To start with, that volley from Van Dijk has made it so awkward. He has to know where his goal is and I think that is where he got a bit lost. He must've thought the bar was further away and when he has gone to reach for it his wrist kind of goes around the bar and somehow the ball gets clawed back, bounces on the bar and then perfectly for Origi. If he left that and it went in he'd be getting the same as he is now. Its just a poor judgement call that is all.Exactly.
Regardless of the mistake, it hits the crossbar twice, yet somehow stays in play and falls right on Origi's head.
Really, taking a chance was the best thing to do. What Pickford did wrong was misjudge it.
But, like you say, it's understandable to then try and either help it on it's way, or try and take it in.
I think he's initially thought it might drop below the bar, then has realised that it won't, and he's tried to tip it over.
The result is an almighty cock up.
Exactly.
Regardless of the mistake, it hits the crossbar twice, yet somehow stays in play and falls right on Origi's head.
Exactly.
Regardless of the mistake, it hits the crossbar twice, yet somehow stays in play and falls right on Origi's head.
Again he cocked it up , no doubt can be argued .
On the taking a chance it’s easy now because he’s made a mess of it and it seems obvious. The point I was agreeing with the poster is if in doubt the keeper will never take a chance it’ll go over , you don’t see it . That’s why on replays you see it clearly going wide before a corner , it’s what they’re taught or certainly used to be . Obviously he made a mistake and a bad one but it doesn’t change that I understand why he was wasn’t just leaving it , not that he did what he did with it though .
If that makes any kind of sense ?
Because he changed the natural flight of the ball by trying to catch it. He leaves it and hits the bar and trickles on the the roof of the net
That's all well and good but I don't think his mistake yesterday had anything to do with confidence or arrogance. It wasn't like his kick v West Ham, for example.
It was a looping, spinning ball that he misjudged. It's a clanger, and there's no excuse, but in reality what we actually needed him to be there was his usual confident self. He second-guessed himself and look what happened. Had he been confident, he'd have let it hit the bar and bounce out. But he knew the magnitude of the situation and tried to compensate, and got it wrong.
Haha mate I know you were agreeing I was the poster
Just talking it through. It's a cock up, but like you say the logic was clearly there from Pickford. It's got f all to do with being arrogant, but it is a terrible mistake.
I was thinking this, fair play to Origi to follow it up. Our centre halves must've went to sleep.couple of other notes, why was no one closing down VVD and where none of the 3 Cbs marking origin, so many questions
I was thinking this, fair play to Origi to follow it up. Our centre halves must've went to sleep.
But tbf I assume they were expecting the ball to go out and not what ended up happening.
Totally agree mate.I don't place any blame on our defenders for that. 100% on Pickford.