Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Or Stoke would never sell Butland to us and we're switching targets instead of spending all summer doing what we did last year going after players we couldn't get to end up with Valencia on deadline day?
Futility is a thing in the world of transfers.
What, you think paying £30M for this GK from a Sunderland team that were hopeless is good business?The irony of this post is sublime.
Dave I really do believe that one day soon you will finally disappear up your own a***.
Aren't you just treating Koeman and his decisions the exact same way that Dave treated Martinez and his decisions then?
I thought the days of manager cults were gone the day we finally ditched Martinez, looks like I might have been wrong...
would not surprise me if payment is spread over 2-3 seasons for him.Butland would be £30m+ straight up and who knows what that injury did to him. Stoke also won't likely sell to us.
Pickford IS NOT £30m. It clearly says up to £30m with addons/bonuses. How many players have we scoffed the cost at and then rued it? VVD anyone?
It's not even a comparable kind of deal.
What, you think paying £30M for this GK from a Sunderland team that were hopeless is good business?
You'd think a similar fee for butland would get him. I myself rate butland highly, but just maybe his injury issues of the last 18 months have put off potential clubs. Either way Pickford is a serious upgrade on stek and Robles.Maybe we can't afford Butland. Don't forget we still need about 7 more players.
would not surprise me if payment is spread over 2-3 seasons for him.
Or Stoke would never sell Butland to us and we're switching targets instead of spending all summer doing what we did last year going after players we couldn't get to end up with Valencia on deadline day?
Futility is a thing in the world of transfers.
get a roomI've crossed swords with him many a time, but when you're right you're right, and Dave hasn't said much wrong in here this morning (Though he has said it in his usual combative and abrasive manner)
If (and it's still an if) a £30m package is true, and that is deemed to be the market, what would it cost to take Butland? The received wisdom on here is that Butland is superior to Pickford - so £40m? More?
Would that be deemed to be 'good business'?