BlueStevie35
Player Valuation: £70m
ExactlyJulian Alvarez cost the same amount of money as Neal Maupay.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ExactlyJulian Alvarez cost the same amount of money as Neal Maupay.
Chris Wood went on loan you absolute cabbage, and he’s outscored Maupay by 15 in the same amount of time in the Premier League.
Who informed you? Was it @ForeverBlue92 tagging you again?I only clicked 'see post' after being informed that you are still following me around the forum like a love struck stalker who can't accept they've been jibbed off.
What do you mean, he's doing bits 24/7Bloke is useless imo
In relative terms a PL striker who had scored 16 gols in the previous 2 seasons is peanuts.
Chris Wood went for £25 millions as a comparison. Richarlison who only scored 2 more last season than Maupay went for £50 millions and had we not been desperate for the funds we'll have likely held out for £60m+
Exactly
Difference is Maupay cost us £15 millions and Brighton let us pay on the drip.
A good level CF outside of the super rare finds costs you £40+ millions these days. Richarlison cost Spuds £50 millions to warm their bench and look at what Newcastle spent on that Isak fella £60+ millions was it ?
Would have had to pay a good chunk up top and pay big wages on top of the fee.
Fantasy talk by some posters.
£12m City paid for him from River Plate, wasn’t a Champions League playerAnd Alvaraz is a CL player not one gagging to join a relegation battling outfit.
....honestly, your posts get even more ridiculous the further you get into a discussion. When you are wrong, the worst thing you can do is try and reason your way out. As daft as it sounds it makes you look even worst.
Brereton DiazName me some strikers we were linked with who we could have afforded ?
Its easy slating others for their opinions whilst offering nothing to the debate other than "ffs Kev la why u no sign Alveraz over Man City".
Mate just to let you know I have you on egnore these days because your obsession with me was borderline strange/creepy. I only clicked 'see post' after being informed that you are still following me around the forum like a love struck stalker who can't accept they've been jibbed off.
A word of frandly advice - spend your saturday evenings fingering yer bird and not me you loser - your outlook on life might just become more positive ! lol
Of course you have. Looks like it.
Do people not realise if they have you on ignore it means you've effectively ended them.
He must’ve clicked show ignore content on my post about Alvarez too because he acknowledged that above in response to Stevie. Is there a point having someone on ignore if you just keep clicking show ignored content?