Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
i think maybe earl is mixed up. this project has been worked on for over 2 years, so i'm sure tesco know whether they're giving us £50 million for our stadium. they've said not. earl doesn't represent tesco.I think you might be getting mixed up with something last summer when a Tesco spokesman (not Leahy) denied Wyness's claims of £50m but that was last summer before the ballot. A lot has happened since then and I don't think anyone has denied Earl's clear public claims of the £55m cheque.
I have never heard of a public company giving funds to other businesses. If I was a Tesco shareholder I wouldn't be happy that my investment was giving away £55m to what is effectively a failing business.
plenty of ways to skin a cat.
"if everton move our company will be allowed to build the biggest tesco in britain on prime land in a densely populated area. that we help everton move means we pay a much reduced rate for the land and the planning.
your share value will increase on the back of this one project.
dont be such short sighted imbiciles. its our work that has seen you reaping rewards for X amount of years. in future engage your brains before getting uppity."
if you're trying to suggest that everton will get £50 million because the share price will go up (double?), then by the same token a successful project would presumably boost tesco's share price, so wouldn't that mean that everton had "given" tesco £X million? of course, this overlooks that fact that the club wouldn't see any of this money as it would be the shareholders who would benefit (what an incentive for any who may wish to sell at a profit!), whilst the club would be left with the debt incurred to fund the development.
I have never heard of a public company giving funds to other businesses. If I was a Tesco shareholder I wouldn't be happy that my investment was giving away £55m to what is effectively a failing business.
it's what i thought suitsblue was suggesting was happening as the route by which tesco would "give" everton £50million & you're quite right that would be stupid, so i'm glad you've picked up on that. but maybe that isn't what suitsblue meant, if so, no doubt he'll clarify later.This is all just a big load of [Poor language removed]. No one is getting anywhere with this arguement. Ye're just all twisting each others words to suit yourselves and it will never get anywhere. I thought you said you were a neutral again DENNIS?? Doesn't seem that way. What are you on about anyway just because we help boost their share price doesn't mean we are giving them money. I dont wanna get sucked into this arguement but that's just stupid DENNIS.
It's not the distance from Goodison Park or the council boundaries that are the problem. It's the direction (in more ways than one).
The club should be looking to move to the city centre as that is where the corporate money can be made and that is where the public transport infrasture is already in place (saving us millions in the long term).
Kirkby population: 42,000. Stadium capacity: 50,000 rising to 60,000 (70,000 in the future if micknick's deleted post is anything to go by), at the very beginning.. the capacity of the stadium is one fifth larger than the town's population.
Also there is the small matter of playground politics or the 'wool' consideration. It is not my intention to disrespect those who live in Kirkby (they are scouse, Scottie Road exiles mostly). Children in the city will undoubtedly criticise/bully/persecute those who support the 'wool' club (the team not in the city), some will switch allegiance to avoid the insults and this will undoubtedly affect our long term support.