2023/24 Lewis Dobbin

[Neiler]

Imagine Rhianna asks you for a nob pic.

I rate them as equally likely

You’re right of course!

She's a nuisance at this stage!

 

[Glasshalffull]

By keeping the amount at a relatively modest level (say £10m), it’s very hard for the premier league to challenge whether the transaction is at market value.

Selling Dobbin for say £50m on paper would likely receive challenge.

Having said that, maybe I’m giving the premier league too much credit here!

Plus, we'd have to explain the transactions to the PL while keeping a straight face. I doubt there's anyone on the planet with the self control and restraint to do that with £50 million fees.

 

[kenada_blue]

People saying Dobbin has pace, he looked like he was running in treacle like Magaye Gueye the few times I saw him in the first team. Not one I’m scared of coming back to bite us, and think we’re getting the better end of the deal with Tim coming here. Wish him all the best though.

Lookman and Gordon seem to have found success elsewhere. Dobby could fit the same bill.

 

[perth_blue]

Really? With Ramsey, Diaby, Buendia, Bailey, Rogers already established and Kellyman coming through? It's pretty obvious why they've done this deal.

Yeah the deal is obvious. But he'll still get plenty of opportunities at Villa.

 

[JimmyK]

Lookman and Gordon seem to have found success elsewhere. Dobby could fit the same bill.

They're terrible comparisons.

 

[T LEAFE]

Imagine he scores 15 goals for Villa next season.

Dobbo could get 20

 

[Tin-Tin]

 

[MikeH72]

Imagine he scores 15 goals for Villa next season.

*imagines*

*stops imagining ridiculous things*

 

[Tilling]

That tweet has misunderstood the article. The article that's being referenced there (which relies on a lot of assumptions, albeit most fairly reasonable) puts us at £3.3m within the PSR regulations. In other words, we are already compliant, and the sale of Dobbin would give us extra wiggle room.

What's probably the reality is that we are not within the PSR regulations by a small amount (£~5m), and the assumptions in the article are slightly too optimistic, hence the sale of Dobbin. In other words, the article is probably a little bit wrong.

 

[EFC_FRANCIS]

Yeah the deal is obvious. But he'll still get plenty of opportunities at Villa.

I'm really not seeing it. They're getting Illing Jr as well. He's going to be on loan next season and probably the one after that

 

[blueboy72]

TalkSPORT and the Manchester media ain’t going to like this

 

[Goat]

That tweet has misunderstood the article. The article that's being referenced there (which relies on a lot of assumptions, albeit most fairly reasonable) puts us at £3.3m within the PSR regulations. In other words, we are already compliant, and the sale of Dobbin would give us extra wiggle room.

What's probably the reality is that we are not within the PSR regulations by a small amount (£~5m), and the assumptions in the article are slightly too optimistic, hence the sale of Dobbin. In other words, the article is probably a little bit wrong.

The assumptions in the article are WILD, to say the least.

 

[Tony’s Carp]

That tweet has misunderstood the article. The article that's being referenced there (which relies on a lot of assumptions, albeit most fairly reasonable) puts us at £3.3m within the PSR regulations. In other words, we are already compliant, and the sale of Dobbin would give us extra wiggle room.

What's probably the reality is that we are not within the PSR regulations by a small amount (£~5m), and the assumptions in the article are slightly too optimistic, hence the sale of Dobbin. In other words, the article is probably a little bit wrong.

He also notes himself that his numbers assume we win the interest argument, which is hopefully not an assumption the club themselves are making.

 

[Neiler]

He also notes himself that his numbers assume we win the interest argument, which is hopefully not an assumption the club themselves are making.

Off topic, but wondered could we look to get that struck off, given the rule states the offence has to be dealt with the the same season.

 

[trueblue84]

That tweet has misunderstood the article. The article that's being referenced there (which relies on a lot of assumptions, albeit most fairly reasonable) puts us at £3.3m within the PSR regulations. In other words, we are already compliant, and the sale of Dobbin would give us extra wiggle room.

What's probably the reality is that we are not within the PSR regulations by a small amount (£~5m), and the assumptions in the article are slightly too optimistic, hence the sale of Dobbin. In other words, the article is probably a little bit wrong.

That Everton Extra twitter account misrepresents everything. I reckon it needs blacklisting on here.