PeregrineT
Player Valuation: £35m
Yeah, while I hope he plays well, he would not be a solution, he would just be a band-aid.I've been harsh on him.
But he HAS to be better than Martina.
I'd just prefer a new LB really.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah, while I hope he plays well, he would not be a solution, he would just be a band-aid.I've been harsh on him.
But he HAS to be better than Martina.
I'd just prefer a new LB really.
Funny, it was watching him in a televised match play for Fulham that alarm bells rung for me. He looked totally disinterested, just jogging back after he’d lost the ball while the opposition went on the attack. I think that was his first loan after getting his new contract.Alarm bells rang for me when he gave this interview while out on loan at Fulham:
http://www.getwestlondon.co.uk/spor...ews/everton-helping-fulham-make-luke-11048496
"But Garbutt insists the crash, bang, wallop of the second tier has done him a pile of good.
He said: “They’ve ( Everton coaches) have given me tips on how I can perform better.
“Things like ‘you’ve got to defend the back post and stop crosses more’. I think the qualities I do have, at times I’ve not really shown."
I'm sorry, but if a Premier League full back is having to be rung up by his coaches and be told that, as a full back, he needs to stop crosses and defend the back post, then there's nothing down for him.
He wouldn't be alone in our defence not stopping crosses. It's my biggest issue with how we defend and we've been like it for yonks.
He must be really terrible at it because he's currently behind someone that hasn't stopped a cross in his life.
Funny, it was watching him in a televised match play for Fulham that alarm bells rung for me. He looked totally disinterested, just jogging back after he’d lost the ball while the opposition went on the attack. I think that was his first loan after getting his new contract.
He must be really terrible at it because he's currently behind someone that hasn't stopped a cross in his life.
...as mentioned earlier, I was amazed when he signed that contract because his stock was high and he could’ve left on a lucrative Bosman. If i’d been advising him, he’d have been off to a club where he’d have been first choice. That would’ve been at least at Championship level but I remember posting at the time that I wouldn’t be surprised if he was on the radar of a Premiership club because of his set piece delivery quality.
What you say makes sense. I have a term: ‘plays like the game matters’. I don’t know Garbutt but perhaps the game doesn’t matter much to him and he was content to play 2nd fiddle to Baines whilst remaining on a very pleasant contract.
Yeah, while I hope he plays well, he would not be a solution, he would just be a band-aid.
He was under 24. It would have ended up in a tribunal and we'd have got a decent fee.
..and he’d have been getting first team football, a better contract and a signing fee. It sort of lacked ambition given that Baines was possibly the best LB in the country at that time.
He is not really behind him at this stage Mike, because he ain't eligible for selection thanks to Koeman
Yes but it would not have been a bosman. The fee would have been unknown until potentially 6 months later. Not many clubs going to offer a huge signing on bonus and massive contract for a player who could end up costing them a fortune.
Is there any reason he can’t be registered now? Surely new signings are getting registered in the squad. Why wait until end of January
It is, but its not so great when you put a bandaid on a leg that needs to be amputated and then say "See, taken care of".Agreed but a band-aid is better than a gapping wound.