Any club that watches a player once and sign him will not end up in a great position.Take your point but...
That’s where the “key passes” and “chances created” stats come in.
Your absolutely right that goals and assists stats don’t mean everything. However, there are many other stats to look at when judging a player.
The people who say “watching a player is the best way to judge him” have a point. But you wouldn’t just watch them once. Is Steven Naismith as good as the hat trick against Chelsea suggests? No. You’d have to watch him 5-10 times to see how good he really is.
Realistically stats don’t show the whole picture. Neither does watching a player play 1 game.
A mixture of stats and watching a player is the best way to judge them. That’s what most football clubs do before spending their money.
The player’s lifestyle and potential off the field problems are also important. As is the player’s family situation, agent and language skills.
However, offer me the chance to watch a player once or look at 3 years worth of stats for a player efc might sign and if I was making the decision I’d take the stats.
Stats may alert a club to a player. But extensively watching him is the way to go.
Players are mentioned on the transfer thread and people come in with goals and assists stats and right them off or big them up. That's ridiculous .