Can the people going on about Martinez get a few facts straight. 1 for all of this "he only got relegated because of lack of funds". The idea that with our superior funds, it would not be a problem. The simple truth is, our wage bill is a lot closer to Wigans, than to Spurs', (never mind Liverpool, Arsenal etc).
Secondly when asked if wnning the FA cup would cover up a poor league performance, Martinez himself said that cup success would not make up for "not meeting their targets in the league". This season has been an abject failure from him, as you are judged on league performance.
The fact he has managed to finish below the might Steve Bruce, and Paul Jewel should set the alarm bells ringing. I am always very nervous when a manager is said to "play attacking football" as normally it is a justification deficiencies in other areas. You can't measure "good football", it is subjective. We can measure league perfomance, and Martinez has been disastrous this season.
Also, this attacking football doesn't suffice. They have scored less goals than us this season. Don't confuse an inability to defend with playing attacking football. I have never seen Wigan play, anything close to how we played against West Ham on Saturday.
We are Everton for christ sake. We do not, and should not appoint someone who has just relegated a team. Is that how low fans expectations have sunk under this board? That because he played "attacking football" and he beat an off colour City side (and the Mighty Millwall in the semi's) that we are now going to accept Relegation Man as a good appointment? 15 years Kenwright have had it's impact by the looks of things.