If you watch it you’d seeHow was he doing that when Diaz got the ball past him and onto Keane's hand...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you watch it you’d seeHow was he doing that when Diaz got the ball past him and onto Keane's hand...
But it seems Dyche doesn’t rate Patterson in the same way he can see the class of Branthwaite
Regardless of Patterson's limitations, he is far better than the 2023 version of Ashley Young, there is no doubt that Young was a fine player, but, WAS is the operative word, he tires quickly and is often walked past.
Do the haters still want this lad not starting games then?
Shame you’ve been wrong all season, as has dyche.
Didn’t put a foot wrong today coming on in trying circumstances.
He’s no more of a liability than Young and needs games and a manger that believes in him to get better and grow in confidence. Playing Young ahead of him makes no sense. Dyche needs a rethink.
I don’t think we can, we have to back Patterson due to seamus age and injury issues.
We don’t know what state coleman is going to be in when back - I know he will never let us down knowingly, but he’s put himself though it because we had nothing else in seasons past.
Patterson has to be trusted and supported to grow and get better.
I've seen it. He was skinned by Diaz and only Keane covering stopped the ball getting over...with the cost of a penalty we all know, but the fact is that if Patterson (fresh off the bench) had got there he'd have blocked that Diaz cross and we'd have been at 0-0 still.If you watch it you’d see
Do you think that Young is currently a better option than Patterson, I really hope you say yes, because, if you agree with me I would have to worry that my judgement of a player is no longer good. You are fixated with Patterson, I am by no means convinced by him myself, but, he is definitely a better bet than Young.Cos Branthwaite has class and a golden future. That's the difference
Pattersons limitstions costs us goals. Lets see now what happens for a few games with no other option..
You mean dyche who's experienced, has coaching qualifications and only interested in getting his team to win? And sees the players every day? Yes you know more than him is right.
Patterson is a £20m player and a Scottish International. How much longer do we have to give him to show some talent?
Thing is only Steven Gerrard and Rafael Benitez have ever believed in him and can see any talent. Must be red tinted glasses.
Cos Branthwaite has class and a golden future. That's the difference
Pattersons limitstions costs us goals. Lets see now what happens for a few games with no other option..
You mean dyche who's experienced, has coaching qualifications and only interested in getting his team to win? And sees the players every day? Yes you know more than him is right.
Patterson is a £20m player and a Scottish International. How much longer do we have to give him to show some talent?
Thing is only Steven Gerrard and Rafael Benitez have ever believed in him and can see any talent. Must be red tinted glasses.
Next game we should go 5 at the back and have it:
-------------------Keane Tarkowski Branthwaite
------Harrison---------------------------------------Mykolenko
Why do you keep repeating £20mil
PATTERSON WAS NOT SIGNED FOR £20 MIL
So Keane in the team.
Harrison and Mykolenko as wing backs.
How comical.
I doubt even with Young out Patterson gets a start at West Ham...he's that bad.
I'd have Jack Harrison playing the role he did at Leeds many times all day over Patterson bollocksing our defence up...and I reckon Dyche will think that too.
I doubt even with Young out Patterson gets a start at West Ham...he's that bad.
I'd have Jack Harrison playing the role he did at Leeds many times all day over Patterson bollocksing our defence up...and I reckon Dyche will think that too.
Didn’t Patterson come on yesterday? If you believe Dyche doesn’t rate him he wouldn’t have brought him on would he you flute.
Because we're playing 11 v 10 and it's all hands to the pumps and you sacrifice your wide players and pack your team with defenders.
West Ham is another game and we start with 11. It calls for industry and attacking potential.
Anyone who isn't as thick as two short planks sees that....oh.
Jesus wept.But if you want to go 3-5-2 next game, we could have just gone 3-5-1 yesterday with Harrison playing RWB.
But we didn’t.
He brought on an actual right-back.
In fact he even took Harrison off.
So why would he suddenly not use Patterson next match.
Jesus wept.
Shall I post it again for the hard of learning...
we were 10 v 11 at Anfield. WTF are you going with wing backs for in that scenario...
...'kin ell.