For balance, you haven't posted in any other thread than the Nathan Patterson one for almost a year. Wow.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Probably because most of the people who don't rate him happen to be one or more of Irish, Religious, a Celtic supporter and related to Dave lolThose who rate Patterson perpetuate a myth that anyone who doesn't rate him is Irish, religious, a Celtic supporter and related to Dave.
I guess it's easier to do that than actually dispute and debate the criticisms some have for him.
Probably because most of the people who don't rate him happen to be one or more of Irish, Religious, a Celtic supporter and related to Dave lol
The issue is the people who don't rate him are off the charts in their criticism and make zero allowances for his age, experience, efforts and never praise him when he does something well, unlike with other players of similar age. It screams agenda, so people wonder why, because it can't be just football related
I said 'most', meaning not allOK but I'm not Irish, religious or related to Dave and I pay Scottish football no attention at all. I've criticised Onana who is also a 22 year old international who cost a substantial fee and commands considerable wages if you're looking for a comparitor in our squad.
The lazy posters won't debate the points people raise, they'll attack them on a personal level. Don't be like those people.
I said 'most', meaning not all
The vast majority are happy with Patterson and want him to be first choice. He isn't Cafu, but he was better than Pedro Porro, his opposite number today and people are constantly blowing smoke up him.
Any mistake, wayward pass, or missed header and this thread lights up with the usual suspects. It's boring. He's a solid young player and will get better
What is it with this bloke that seems to generate so much angst and aggression amongst posters? It's weird and intriguing at the same time.
Age is not discrimination in football, it is the reality of age and athletics. Grow up and face facts.That's not true. The Ashley Young thread is awash with age discrimatory comments every time he plays.
We can only comment on your posts. They may mature when you hit sixteen years of ageYou don't know what I think, I'm a stranger who happens to post a tiny bit of my thoughts on an Internet forum that you also post on.
He was just crap, this is a whole different ballgameThe Mykolenko thread was the same till he raised his game.
OK but I'm not Irish, religious or related to Dave and I pay Scottish football no attention at all. I've criticised Onana who is also a 22 year old international who cost a substantial fee and commands considerable wages if you're looking for a comparitor in our squad.
The lazy posters won't debate the points people raise, they'll attack them on a personal level. Don't be like those people.
What is it with this bloke that seems to generate so much angst and aggression amongst posters? It's weird and intriguing at the same time.
The Mykolenko thread was the same till he raised his game.
I have no dislike at all for the lad, he seems a nice enough kid and when he plays he always gives 100%, I just don’t think his 100% is enough to be a top level player..there’s no shame in that, there’s hundreds of players in the game who reach a level ..and that’s their level… I don’t know if he will progress and become the player some believe he will, I hope he does but I personally don’t see it in him.Probably because most of the people who don't rate him happen to be one or more of Irish, Religious, a Celtic supporter and related to Dave lol
The issue is the people who don't rate him are off the charts in their criticism and make zero allowances for his age, experience, efforts and never praise him when he does something well, unlike with other players of similar age. It screams agenda, so people wonder why, because it can't be just football related