Always the same tedious maggots as well. They will make the same critiques without having watched the game and will go our of their way to peddle their biased bullshine. Played well and part of a team performance not conceding a goal in which the team got a welcome 3 points, unfortunately that’s triggered the same boring bells who are apparently annoyed because Nathan has played better than they will ever care to admit.Imagine being gutted when one of your own players does well.
Imagine being gutted when one of your own players does well.
Dyche consistently had our full backs tucking in and playing narrow, which made them look worse than they really are - think of Mykolenko.Didn't see him today but generally his positional sense is not great. I like him going forward and if we were playing a back 3/5 he'd be ok.
For me is not that but he really has to show more to nail that rb spotImagine being gutted when one of your own players does well.
Thought he was solid definitely highlights how there's been an agenda set out against him by posters here on the forum
….that’s an absolute nonsense. The lad has been defensively poor, so to highlight that doesn’t mean there’s an agenda against him. A series of Managers haven’t selected him for a reason, no agenda just reality.
Everybody wants him to be the real deal, but he’s been far from that. Only he can change the situation, no excuses.
In Patto's defense @Eggs, all of our RB's under Dyche have been poor bar maybe Godfrey who left in the summer. Young's performances upticked a bit but only because he received many many more chances than Nate. It's clear Dyche did not like him personally and I'm not surprised he is seeing more opportunities under Moyes….that’s an absolute nonsense. The lad has been defensively poor, so to highlight that doesn’t mean there’s an agenda against him. A series of Managers haven’t selected him for a reason, no agenda just reality.
Everybody wants him to be the real deal, but he’s been far from that. Only he can change the situation, no excuses.