It's a different age. No social media campaigns to deal with. We're much more connected to the club now, and them to us.
I know I wouldn't.
It's not.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
- Status
It's a different age. No social media campaigns to deal with. We're much more connected to the club now, and them to us.
I know I wouldn't.
It's not.
larrygobfiend
Player Valuation: £40m
Ha! I must just be a morbid get.
Dya reckon Fred Perry would be having a word with the laurel designs?
davek
Player Valuation: £150m
Dont know mate. It just seems like they screwed up getting too clever by half with the one we're lumped with now, and now they're going round the houses looking to correct a mistake that is very easy to rectify. It's what happens when PR departments are getting a chasing. Less about common sense now than arse saving.
I just don't think it's an easy fix - and I think they are doing exactly the right thing, albeit later than they should have.
That's not to say I don't have reservations...
I am worried about the talent at Kenyon Fraser - that 'portfolio' is really underwhelming. I saw this yesterday, and I hope we get something equally as good... but Palace have the advantage of a freakin' eagle on their badge. How sexy can we make Price Rupert's tower, really?
Dave,
have a look at the photo on the article here:
Echo
Look at the logo on the scarfs vs the logo on the shirt. While the one on the scarfs is proportionally slightly bigger, you can still see what they are trying to achieve. Its legible, distinctive and easily identifiable to a third part. Now look at the shirts. Its just a blur, its illegible and the much vaunted elements like the motto are irrelevant because they can't be seen. And this is the environment where a motto is used, or a similar situation where its scaled down and used on a document. Most of the examples being used are being discussed at x10 the size they will be used, which is pointless.
Now I don't necessarily like the new crest, but I do entirely understand what they are trying to achieve.
have a look at the photo on the article here:
Echo
Look at the logo on the scarfs vs the logo on the shirt. While the one on the scarfs is proportionally slightly bigger, you can still see what they are trying to achieve. Its legible, distinctive and easily identifiable to a third part. Now look at the shirts. Its just a blur, its illegible and the much vaunted elements like the motto are irrelevant because they can't be seen. And this is the environment where a motto is used, or a similar situation where its scaled down and used on a document. Most of the examples being used are being discussed at x10 the size they will be used, which is pointless.
Now I don't necessarily like the new crest, but I do entirely understand what they are trying to achieve.
OneTrueLegend
Player Valuation: £35m
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BLTxqtYCcAEWCTz.png
This one is still the best for me, it also fulfils the design brief set out by the club
This one is still the best for me, it also fulfils the design brief set out by the club
I'd be far happier with something like this. Here's my bastardised versions from when the monstrosity first appeared:
imagegainer .c o m/images/ChadSchofield/efc. png
(sorry to have to break it up... post count too low!
Right one's a bit too Chelski for my liking now though.
larrygobfiend
Player Valuation: £40m
I think they're a bit tacky mate, and a bit of a Chelsea snide TBH.
The laurel design still gets my vote. Very unique, traditional and classy.
RFUS
Anustart
Gorgeous crest. Yes please.
B
Big Fat Sam
Guest
Not a fan of that above. Middle one looks like Chelsea, ffs 
Can't see why they wouldn't, provided it does the job they need it to do.
dbignall85
Player Valuation: £2.5m
A new crest in 6 weeks?? Doesn't seem a lot of time at all, although the current one looks like it was designed during a coffee break.
- Status